MilesStandish
- 4
- 0
...sent one into a black hole?
The discussion revolves around the implications of sending one of two quantum entangled particles into a black hole, exploring the effects on the remaining particle and the nature of quantum entanglement in extreme gravitational conditions. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual challenges related to quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR).
Participants express differing views on the effects of sending an entangled particle into a black hole, with no consensus reached on the implications for the remaining particle or the nature of entanglement under such conditions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants acknowledge limitations in current understanding, particularly regarding the lack of experimental evidence for the behavior of entangled particles in extreme gravitational fields and the complexities surrounding the black hole information paradox.
No. Why would it?MilesStandish said:So the particle that didn't go into the black hole also disappears? ∞
MilesStandish said:So the particle that didn't go into the black hole also disappears? ∞
MilesStandish said:So when you observe the particle that didn't go into the black hole nothing odd will happen. I guess I'm asking an impossible questions since its going to be a long time before we can start sending stuff into black holes :)
Drakkith said:No, we already know what will happen. It doesn't matter that we haven't been to a black hole yet, the rules still work the same.
Maui said:There is no reason to believe that nonlocality, if it exists, can be affected by mass and gravity. AFAIK, no experiment so far has shown any such hint. The more interesting question is what happens to the wave packet as it enters the horizon.