What Happens to an Electron During Quantum Tunneling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KAZSyed
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of quantum tunneling and the behavior of electrons within potential barriers. It explores the implications of David Bohm's interpretation, which suggests that while the kinetic energy of the electron remains positive, there exists a negative quantum potential energy. The Copenhagen interpretation posits that the wavefunction is the primary reality, and the tunneling electron does not exhibit negative kinetic energy. Additionally, there is a provocative suggestion that an electron tunneling through a barrier could be observed as a positron. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics to grasp these complex concepts.
KAZSyed
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm Syed ,loving Physics from my childhood.I have no knowledge of hard core Physics,though I'm an M.Sc Physics.My area of interest is Theoretical Phyiscs,which needs Paper,Pen and Brain of which I have the first two and lacks third.So,Please help me to do better in this field.I'd be much obliged for that.

Here is the question I persevere to know a Better Answer .

What happens to an electron within a Potential barrier when it tunnels through it without enough KE to overcome it ?

Can we observe an electron with negative KE within the barrier ? What is the Physical Meaning of this all ?
(I am not satisfied with the answer David Bohm has given in his book)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What answer does Bohm give? I haven't read his book.
 
"What happens to an electron within a Potential barrier when it tunnels through it without enough KE to overcome it ?"


Nothing really. The electron exists within the barrier and outside of it at the same time.
 
David Bohm basically formulated the following theory: Reality has 2 things - the wavefunction of all degrees of freedom, and the actuall current position (a classical point in phase space). The wavefunction evolves in time via the ordinary equations of QM, and completely ignores 'the actuall position', while the position evolves accourding to Newton's laws of motion with an addition of a quantum potential which is a non local functional of the wavefunction.

This theory is compatible with all observations of QM, but it doesn't have any new predictions, so it's untestable.

Bohm's answer to Syed's question is therefor that the kinetic energy is positive, but there is negative 'quantum potential' energy.

The answer within the Coopenhagen's interpretation's viewpoint should probably be just that the wavefunction is all that is, and that the tunneling particle never has 'negative kinetic energy'. The kineric energy operator is minus the laplacian, and that's a hermitian operator with a strictly positive spectrum.
 
Those who have read Dirac,Feynmann and the All powerful Wheeler there is a simple answer to the question I have posted earlier concerning the tunneling of an electron through a potential barrier:

We can still observe it but not as an electron but as a positron !
I should like to discuss this.
 
KAZSyed said:
Those who have read Dirac,Feynmann and the All powerful Wheeler there is a simple answer to the question I have posted earlier concerning the tunneling of an electron through a potential barrier:

We can still observe it but not as an electron but as a positron !
I should like to discuss this.


We don't discuss posting based on misinterpretation of basic physics except to say: get an education!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K