What has been the greatest discovery in physics in the last 25 years?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on identifying the greatest discoveries in physics over the last 25 years, with participants highlighting significant advancements such as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the accelerating expansion of the universe, and the discovery that neutrinos have mass. The debate also touches on historical milestones, including quantum mechanics (QM) developments by Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and Dirac, and the importance of general relativity (GR). Participants argue that while GR has theoretical significance, QM has yielded more practical technological advancements, such as transistors and lasers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics (QM) principles
  • Familiarity with General Relativity (GR) concepts
  • Knowledge of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)
  • Awareness of the significance of Bell's Theorem and Aspect's experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) on cosmology
  • Explore the significance of neutrino mass in particle physics
  • Investigate the advancements in High Temperature (High Tc) superconductors
  • Study the developments in string theory and Ed Witten's contributions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the evolution of modern physics and its technological applications.

Helicobacter
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
And what has been the greatest discovery in the last 50 years? QED?

For 100 years, it's clearly general relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think quantum physics is more important than GR. And I'm talking about modern QM, like Heisenberg, Shrodinger, and Dirac, not Planck and Bohr, so it would definitely qualify for the last 100 years. QM wins over GR especially because GR without "dark matter" fails to explain the rotation of galaxies. (The fact that Einstein invented SR to do away with the ether makes me think he'd be ashamed of today's GR experts cooking up dark matter.) Also, without QM, where would we be technologically? Transistors are the cornerstone of modern technology. GR can't really claim to have yielded anything technological or otherwise practically useful. (I guess there are gravitational-dilation-corrected clocks on satellites... that's about it.)

Greatest discovery since 1961? Could be Bell's Theorem and Aspect's experiments. I feel like QED was already being developed by Schwinger and Feynman by 61. The development of string theory may or may not turn out to be a great discovery.

Greatest discovery in the last 25 years? that's pretty tough. 1986... Possibly the CMB and inflationary cosmology. Ed Witten's unification of string theory, possibly. And of course (if you're mathematically inclined,) the proof of the Poincare conjecture.
 
Last edited:
thanks. i didnt even know about "Bell's Theorem and Aspect's experiments"

even though I'm a layman, i will agree with you on CMB for the last 25 years. EDIT: actually this does not fall in the last 25 years. also, Ed Witten & Grigori Perelmann might have solved some of the hardest mathematical problems known to man, I don't see how the poincare conjecture falls into the domain of physics and how Ed Witten's M-theory can be experimentally verified.
 
Last edited:
Helicobacter said:
And what has been the greatest discovery in the last 50 years? QED?

For 100 years, it's clearly general relativity.

Just my opinion, but the greatest discovery since:

1987: High T superconductivity, or maybe optical communications
1962: The laser or the renormalization group
1912: Transistor.
 
For the past 25 years, these come to mind:

1. Accelerating expansion rate of the universe
2. Neutrinos are not massless
3. High Tc superconductors

I'm not quite sure if Supernova 1987A qualifies as a discovery.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Just my opinion, but the greatest discovery since:

1987: High T superconductivity, or maybe optical communications
1962: The laser or the renormalization group
1912: Transistor.

when it comes to practical applications, yes. i should have specified the question to be at the natural/theoretical level.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K