What Holds Nucleons Together: Gluons or Binding Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms that hold nucleons (protons and neutrons) together within an atomic nucleus, specifically examining the roles of gluons (strong force) and binding energy. Participants explore theoretical perspectives and the interplay between different forces involved in nucleon interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gluons from quarks are responsible for holding nucleons together through the strong force.
  • Others argue that the concept of binding energy, which relates to the mass deficit in total nucleon mass, is also a significant factor in nucleon stability.
  • A participant mentions that the strong force can be likened to van der Waals forces or tidal forces, suggesting a complex interaction between quarks in adjacent nucleons.
  • One participant highlights the importance of both strong and electromagnetic forces, noting that electromagnetic repulsion between protons contributes positively to the total energy, which could destabilize the nucleus.
  • Another participant discusses the effective residual force in nucleon interactions, describing it as having both repulsive and attractive components, with the attractive component prevailing in stable nuclei.
  • There is a call for more precise questioning regarding whether the focus should be on nucleon interactions or quark-gluon interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms that hold nucleons together, with no consensus reached on the primary factor or the relationship between binding energy and the strong force.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of calculating the contributions of different forces and the potential for various models to yield different insights into nucleon stability.

tonyp1001
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What actually holds nucleons together? Is it gluons from quarks (ie the strong force), or the mass defecit in total nucleon mass (binding energy)? How does one differentiate between these?

Regards in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tonyp1001 said:
What actually holds nucleons together?
It's quantum mechanics : there is nothing the proton can decay into. I understand this is very disappointing as an answer, but you see, there is more than one theoretician out there who would be delighted if we could finally measure the proton decay rate, and into what. I'm sure the majority of people uninterested into unified theories would be rather concerned.

You may also hear that if one tries to pull out even a single quark from the proton, the glue field energy grows out of proportion until new particles are created. The above statement is that there is no final state with the same conserved quantum numbers as the proton but less total mass. What is disappointing is that it merely elevates the proton to carrying a non-vanishing conserved quantum number, which goes by the name of baryon number.

This being said, there is no mass deficit in the proton, rather, quite a large mass excess !
 
Last edited:
tonyp1001 said:
What actually holds nucleons together? Is it gluons from quarks (ie the strong force),
Yep, that's it. (the non-technical answer)

Slightly more precisely, the quarks that make up a proton or neutron are held together by gluons, a.k.a. the strong force. In an atomic nucleus, the various protons and neutrons are held together by something slightly analogous to van der Waals forces (between atoms), or tidal forces (in gravity) - it's a slight attraction due to the fact that one quark might be on one end of a nucleon and therefore attract oppositely colored quarks in adjacent nucleons. Or so I've read, anyway (I forget where, otherwise I'd give you a reference).
 
Thanks to both replies - any more detail would be greatly appreciated.
 
tonyp1001 said:
Thanks to both replies - any more detail would be greatly appreciated.
You may have as much detail as you need, but it would help if you can formulate a more precise question. Are you interested in nuclei (nucleon interaction) or nucleons (quark and gluon interaction) ?
 
Last edited:
I'm interested in what holds protons and neutron inside the nucleus, whether it is binding energy, the strong force, a combinaation, or something else? I have read that it is actually the stong force 'leaking out' of the quark attractive strong force. But where does binding energy fi into this scenario?

Thanks
 
tonyp1001 said:
But where does binding energy fi into this scenario?
The energy is what allows us to calculate whether the system is stable or not. Indeed you need to take into account both the strong and the electromagnetic force. The electromagnetic repulsion between the protons contributes positively to the total energy, making the system want to fly apart. The contribution of the strong force is more difficult to calculate. Roughly speaking, you may represent the effective residual (van der Waals) force with two components, one mostly repulsive (stemming from the exchange of vector bosons like the omega and the rhos) and one attractive (stemming from the exchange of scalar bosons like the pions or the "effective" (?) sigma or the eta), both of which are large. Eventually, the attractive component wins in the cases where the nuclei is stable.

This is just a simple example of Yukawa-like calculation. There are many possible calculations, some of which brute-force, with different ingredients depending on the goal and the emphasis of the model.
 
Thanks very much for the explanation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K