What is a Decay width really, qualitatively?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The decay width of a particle, such as the Z boson with a mass of 91 GeV and a decay width of 2.5 GeV, is defined as the inverse of the mean lifetime and is directly related to the probability of decay. The distinction between "physical" mass and "reconstructed" mass is crucial, as the reconstructed mass can vary due to experimental uncertainties. The width of the peak in a mass distribution plot reflects both the decay width and the resolution of the detector. Understanding these concepts is essential for interpreting particle decay processes accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, including mass and decay processes.
  • Familiarity with detector resolution and its impact on measurements.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between decay width and mean lifetime.
  • Basic grasp of invariant mass in particle collisions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between decay width and mean lifetime in particle physics.
  • Explore the concept of reconstructed mass and its uncertainties in experimental physics.
  • Learn about the Z boson and its decay characteristics in high-energy physics experiments.
  • Investigate the effects of detector resolution on mass measurements in particle collisions.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, experimental physicists, and students studying high-energy physics who seek to deepen their understanding of decay processes and mass measurements.

AlanKirby
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi there, my question is along the lines of the following.

I understand that in an experiment we obtain a distribution of masses for a given particle, due to the finite resolution of the detectors.

In terms of a fundamental (if that even makes sense) decay width, what is the decay width?
Is it simply the following:
Peak value is the particle rest mass; distribution at higher energy is particles with larger velocity; distribution at lower energy are 'off mass shell' particles?

I'm having quite a bit of trouble really getting around what a decay width really is and how to think about it. I understand (to some extent) the point about resolution in experiments, and the relation of width to lifetime, but I don't truly understand.

Thanks for any replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particle velocity (in which frame?) is irrelevant, the mass is always determined by the energy in the rest frame of the particle.

You have to distinguish between "physical" mass (the physical process) and reconstructed mass (the estimate from the experiments).
The "physical" mass can be a bit below or above the peak value (where peak value is "the mass of the particle") - the particles are a bit off-shell.
The reconstructed mass is an estimate of this "physical" mass, with its own uncertainty.

Take a Z boson, for example: the mass of the Z is 91 GeV and its decay width is 2.5 GeV. An actual Z boson in a collision could have an invariant mass of 92 GeV. It decays, a detector sees the decay products and might get 92.3 GeV as estimate (random example),
If you plot the reconstructed mass values, the width of the peak is the combination of decay width and detector resolution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlanKirby
mfb said:
The particle velocity (in which frame?) is irrelevant, the mass is always determined by the energy in the rest frame of the particle.

You have to distinguish between "physical" mass (the physical process) and reconstructed mass (the estimate from the experiments).
The "physical" mass can be a bit below or above the peak value (where peak value is "the mass of the particle") - the particles are a bit off-shell.
The reconstructed mass is an estimate of this "physical" mass, with its own uncertainty.

Take a Z boson, for example: the mass of the Z is 91 GeV and its decay width is 2.5 GeV. An actual Z boson in a collision could have an invariant mass of 92 GeV. It decays, a detector sees the decay products and might get 92.3 GeV as estimate (random example),
If you plot the reconstructed mass values, the width of the peak is the combination of decay width and detector resolution.
That really helps, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
920
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K