What is a Hermitian Operator? Explained & Proven

Click For Summary
A Hermitian operator is defined by the property <ϕm|A|ϕn> = <ϕn|A|ϕm>* for basis vectors |ϕn> and |ϕm>. To prove the more general definition <a|A|b> = <b|A|a>* for arbitrary vectors |a> and |b>, one should express these vectors in terms of the basis. The discussion highlights the challenge in proving this property, particularly in manipulating the sums involving the coefficients amn. A suggestion is made to start with the expression <a|A|b> and apply the initial definition to facilitate the proof. Understanding the relationship between the basis vectors and the coefficients is crucial for completing the proof.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Hi, this is actually more a math-problem than a physics-problem, but I thought I'd post my question here and see if anyone can help me.
So I'm writing an assignment in which I have to define, what is understood by a hermitian operator.
My teacher has told me to definere it as:
<ϕm|A|ϕn> = <ϕn|A|ϕm>* , where lϕn> and lϕm> is the n'th and m'th unit operator.
And using this i then have to proof the more general definition:
<a|A|b> = <b|A|a>*, la> and lb> being arbitrary vectors.
I've tried to do so but I have yet not succeeded:
What I've done is to say: Take a hermitian operator. Since it's hermitian it must satisfy:

A = ∑_(m,n)|ϕm>amn <ϕn| = ∑(m,n)|ϕm> anm*<ϕm|
Which when dotted with 2 arbitrary vectors|ψ> and <φ|equals to:
<φ|A|ψ> = ∑(m,n) <φ|ϕm>amn<ϕn|ψ> = ∑(m,n) <ϕm|φ>*amn <ψ|ϕn>* =
∑(m,n) <ψ|ϕn>* amn <ϕm|φ>*
Since A is hermitian this equals to:
∑(m,n) <ψ|ϕn>* amn <ϕm|φ>* = ∑(m,n) <ψ|ϕn>*anm*<ϕm|φ>* = [∑(m,n) <ψ|ϕn>anm<ϕm|φ>]*
Now the proof would work if |ϕn>anm<ϕm| = |ϕm>amn<ϕn|, but that's not right is it?
Can anyone help me how to proove this? I know it's simple, but I'm still finding it a little hard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
where lϕn> and lϕm> is the n'th and m'th unit operator.
I assume you mean basis vector, not unit operator.

I suggest that you start with <a|A|b>, express |a> and |b> in terms of that basis, and then use the definition your teacher has told you to use.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
17K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K