A What is a 'Quantum Coherence'?

TimWilliams87
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I'm unsure of what it means for a system or state to have various 'quantum coherences' which can be selected.
I have recently been reading some stuff on quantum information in the physics literature which refers to 'a mechanism by which a measurement in A determines quantum coherences in B', where A and B are subsystems of a larger system.

I am aware of the meaning of the terms 'decoherence' and 'coherent state', but could someone clarify for me what it means for a system to have several 'quantum coherences' which can be chosen from?

Also in a paper 'On the role of complex phases in the quantum statistics of weak measurements', I have seen the following quotation:
''As early as 1995, Steinberg pointed out that weak measurements provide a natural definition of conditional probabilities in quantum mechanics. However, the mathematically consistent definition of such weak conditional probabilities results in complex numbers originating from the quantum coherences of the initial and final states''.

Again, could someone explain what it means for the initial and final states to have 'quantum coherences'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TimWilliams87 said:
I have recently been reading some stuff on quantum information in the physics literature

Please give specific references.

TimWilliams87 said:
Also in a paper

This paper?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.0062
Please give actual links.
 
The reference is the paper you mention https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.0062, the other quotation was from correspondence with someone working in the area so I cannot really reference it.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top