What is Anti-Symmetric Relation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iwantabelieve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of anti-symmetric relations, specifically addressing the nuances of equality in the context of strings and their lengths. An anti-symmetric relation is defined such that if \( aRb \) and \( bRa \), then \( a \) must equal \( b \). The participants clarify that in the context of strings, the "=" symbol refers to equality in length rather than identity, leading to the conclusion that relations based on string length are indeed anti-symmetric. The confusion arises from the interpretation of "=" in various contexts, particularly when comparing words versus numerical values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory concepts
  • Familiarity with relational properties (symmetric, anti-symmetric)
  • Knowledge of string manipulation and comparison in programming
  • Basic understanding of mathematical notation and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of symmetric and anti-symmetric relations in depth
  • Study examples of anti-symmetric relations in various mathematical contexts
  • Learn about string comparison techniques in programming languages
  • Investigate the implications of equality versus identity in different data types
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and educators interested in relational properties, particularly those working with strings and set theory.

iwantabelieve
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys.

Here I have a question about how to understand the definition of the anti-symmetric relation.

First, we have the following:
If a R b and b R a, then a = b, which is the definition of anti-symmetry.

What I want to know is whether those ≤, ≤, and = are in their literal sense, or something else.

For example, suppose S is a set of alphabetical words, while a and b are two of its members. If we want to express a is no longer than b, we can write: a ≤ b, and b no longer than a: b ≤ a. Here comes the problem, if a=b means a has the same length as b, then anti-symmetry holds for it; however, if a=b means a and b have to be the same word, then anti-symmetry does not hold for this. If a and b are numbers, I think I know the answer well; however, in this specific problem, they are words. So I do not know if I should take ‘=’ in its literal sense, or I should take it as meaning ‘equal in length’.

Any idea is welcome. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A relation is "symmetric" if, any time you have aRb you also have bRa.

A relation is "anti-symmetric" if, any time you have aRb you cannot has bRa.

Of course, most relations are neither symmetric nor anti-symmetric- you have aRb and bRa for some a and b but not all.

As for your example, I think you have it exactly backwards. If aRb means "a and b have the same length", then R is symmetric, not "anti-symmetric". For example the strings a= "xyz" and "uvw" have the same length so aRb is true- but then of course, bRa is also true. If aRb means "a and b are the same word" then R is also symmetric, not anti-symmetric.

If aRb means "a has more letters than b" (a> b, then if aRb, it is impossible that bRa. That is an anti-symmetric relation. If aRb means "a has at least as many letters as b" (a\ge b), then with a= "xyz" and b= "uvw" we have both aRb and bRa so R is NOT anti-symmetric. But if a= "pqrs" and b= "xyz" then we have aRb but not bRa so R is not symmetric either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy - you are confusing antisymmetry with asymmetry. As iwantabelieve said:

If a R b and b R a, then a = b, ... is the definition of anti-symmetry.

So the question is, what does the "=" mean? Is it identity or equality?

In short, it's equality. So "...is no longer than..." is indeed antisymmetric in the domain of words (or strings for that matter).

I see your problem. Every definition out there just uses "=" without specifying and, generally, examples are from the naturals or reals where there are no equal but non-identical pairs. Hmmm... are 0.999... and 1 identical as well as being equal? I guess not, in which case ≤ being antisymmetric in ℝ (a common example online) demonstrates that the "=" is not identity.

I know this is way out of date but I was wondering about this myself recently and it's a good question with no quick answer online.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K