iwantabelieve
- 1
- 0
Hi guys.
Here I have a question about how to understand the definition of the anti-symmetric relation.
First, we have the following:
If a R b and b R a, then a = b, which is the definition of anti-symmetry.
What I want to know is whether those ≤, ≤, and = are in their literal sense, or something else.
For example, suppose S is a set of alphabetical words, while a and b are two of its members. If we want to express a is no longer than b, we can write: a ≤ b, and b no longer than a: b ≤ a. Here comes the problem, if a=b means a has the same length as b, then anti-symmetry holds for it; however, if a=b means a and b have to be the same word, then anti-symmetry does not hold for this. If a and b are numbers, I think I know the answer well; however, in this specific problem, they are words. So I do not know if I should take ‘=’ in its literal sense, or I should take it as meaning ‘equal in length’.
Any idea is welcome. Thank you in advance!
Here I have a question about how to understand the definition of the anti-symmetric relation.
First, we have the following:
If a R b and b R a, then a = b, which is the definition of anti-symmetry.
What I want to know is whether those ≤, ≤, and = are in their literal sense, or something else.
For example, suppose S is a set of alphabetical words, while a and b are two of its members. If we want to express a is no longer than b, we can write: a ≤ b, and b no longer than a: b ≤ a. Here comes the problem, if a=b means a has the same length as b, then anti-symmetry holds for it; however, if a=b means a and b have to be the same word, then anti-symmetry does not hold for this. If a and b are numbers, I think I know the answer well; however, in this specific problem, they are words. So I do not know if I should take ‘=’ in its literal sense, or I should take it as meaning ‘equal in length’.
Any idea is welcome. Thank you in advance!