What is Force? | Force Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter lets_resonate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
Force can be understood in two primary ways: as a mathematical representation (F=ma) and as a physical influence that causes acceleration, linked to fundamental interactions like gravitational and electromagnetic forces. Both perspectives are valid, with neither being more correct than the other. Force exists independently of its mathematical formulation and can be measured through various means, such as spring displacement or weight. The electromagnetic force is the underlying cause of the net force experienced by objects, though simplified models like F=ma are often used for practicality. Ultimately, the concept of force encompasses both its mathematical and physical aspects.
lets_resonate
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What is "force"?

Hello,

As far as I know, there are two ways to look at force:

1. A mathematical shorthand for the quantity ma or \frac {dp}{dt}. Someone got the bright idea that this particular quantity is useful in explaining a particular phenomenon in nature. "The heavier something is, and the faster I want to accelerate it, the more effort I will have to expend in order to push it. I will refer to this effort as 'force'."

2. Force is an actual, physical influence that causes something to accelerate. This influence can be readily explained by one of the four fundamental interactions in nature: the strong and weak nuclear force, gravitational force, and electromagnetic force. Hence, any discussion about force must necessarily involve one of these interactions.

Which viewpoint is the one that is considered more correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well... the first is content free, in that "F=ma" doesn't really say anything if you simply take it as the definition of "F."
 
lets_resonate said:
Hello,

As far as I know, there are two ways to look at force:

1. A mathematical shorthand for the quantity ma or \frac {dp}{dt}. Someone got the bright idea that this particular quantity is useful in explaining a particular phenomenon in nature. "The heavier something is, and the faster I want to accelerate it, the more effort I will have to expend in order to push it. I will refer to this effort as 'force'."

2. Force is an actual, physical influence that causes something to accelerate. This influence can be readily explained by one of the four fundamental interactions in nature: the strong and weak nuclear force, gravitational force, and electromagnetic force. Hence, any discussion about force must necessarily involve one of these interactions.

Which viewpoint is the one that is considered more correct?

They are both correct. Neither is "more correct" than the other.

Force is a concept that exists independently of F=ma and it can be measured independently as well. We could define a unit of force as a certain displacement of a particular spring, for example. Or we could define a unit of force as the "weight" of a certain object. We could then apply various numbers of units of those forces to different masses and measure their acceleration and conclude that F = ma.

AM
 
Force is technically the net result of the electromagnetic forces experienced by the billions of atoms in the objects in question. Therefore, the electromagnetic force is technically the correct definition of force, however we use approximations, such as F = ma to make the calculations much more palatable, and frankly reasonable for humans to solve. F = ma is at its heart a model of the electromagnetic interactions that we experience on a daily basis.

We could model the electromagnetic forces on each atom, and then sum them to find the net "force," however the computations involved are prohibitively expensive.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K