woundedtiger4
- 188
- 0
As the title says.
The discussion centers on identifying and understanding mappings that are neither injective, surjective, nor bijective. Participants explore definitions, examples, and the importance of specifying domains and codomains in relation to these properties.
Participants generally agree on the definitions of injective, surjective, and bijective mappings, but there are nuances in how these properties apply based on domain and codomain specifications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best terminology and examples for mappings that do not fit these categories.
Participants highlight the importance of defining domains and codomains, suggesting that without this clarity, properties of functions may be misrepresented. There is also a recognition of the potential for confusion in the definitions of injection and surjection.
Yes sir, exactly.Nugatory said:Are you asking what term we would use to describe a mapping that is neither injective, surjective, nor bijective? Or are you asking for an example of suchba mapping?
Thank you sirWWGD said:To be more precise, as nuuskur pointed out, the function ## f : \mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R ## defined by ## f(x)= x^2 ## is neither injective nor surjective; f(x)=f(-x) , and no negative number is the image of any number. You need to clearly state your domain and codomain, otherwise every function is trivially surjective onto its image. If you changed/restricted the domain, OTOH, you can make the same _expression_ ##f(x)=x^2 ## a bijection from the positive Reals to themselves. While long-winded, the point is that you must define your domain and codomain in order to define a function and study its properties unambiguously.
nuuskur said:Yes, thank you WWGD. I apologize for my lazy explanation.
woundedtiger4 said:Thank you sir