B What is made up of all the rest quarks?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sheldon73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quarks Rest
Click For Summary
Protons and neutrons are made up of up and down quarks, while other quarks contribute to a variety of baryons and mesons. Heavy quarks lead to unstable particles that typically decay quickly, though some can be relatively stable depending on interactions. The J/ψ particle is noted for its long lifetime due to decay primarily through electromagnetic and weak interactions. Additionally, the longest-lived strange particles, such as K0 and Λ baryons, have specific decay characteristics. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the complexity and instability of particles formed from different quark combinations.
Sheldon73
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The proton and neutron are composed of up and down quarks. What is made up of all the rest quarks?
The proton and neutron are composed of up and down quarks. What is made up of all the rest quarks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes Sheldon73 and vanhees71
Should be added that due to the nature of weak interactions, all baryons and mesons containing heavy quarks are unstable and generally decay relatively fast. They are not present in large quantities anywhere.
 
Well, fast is relative. Since the weak interaction is really weak, some hadrons can be considered as quite stable if there's no strong interaction process leading to its decay. A famous example is the ##J/\psi##, which is pretty long-lived because it only decays through the electromagnetic and weak interaction. It has a very narrow width of 92.6 keV (compared to its mass of about 3.1 GeV):

https://pdglive.lbl.gov/Particle.action?init=0&node=M070&home=MXXX025#decayclump_G
 
Longest lived strange particle is long K0... with ct of 16 m. Longest lived strange baryon is Λ... with 7,8 cm. Whereas n has 260 million km.
 
Orodruin said:
decay relatively fast
vanhees71 said:
Well, fast is relative.
I don’t see a contradiction here. ;)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K