I What is meant by 'affine' model in physical sciences?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Physical
Click For Summary
The term "affine model" in physical sciences appears to be a conflation of "affine transform" and an ideal model. An affine transform is a mathematical operation that preserves parallel lines and is used to map an ideal model to a real-world example. There is no established concept of an "affine model" as a standalone term in the literature. Instead, it may refer to a model that has undergone an affine transformation. The discussion highlights the distinction between the ideal model and the transformation process rather than establishing a unique category of models.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
What's meant by 'affine' model in physical sciences? I guess it's related to some ideal or benchmark model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A ideal model is compared with a real example.
The connection or mapping between the two is an 'affine transform'.
An affine transform preserves parallel lines.
I guess the model of the ideal could be called an 'affine model'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_transformation
 
Baluncore said:
A ideal model is compared with a real example.
The connection or mapping between the two is an 'affine transform'.
An affine transform preserves parallel lines.
I guess the model of the ideal could be called an 'affine model'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_transformation
affine transform has nothing to do with affine model?
 
feynman1 said:
affine transform has nothing to do with affine model?
There seems to be no such thing as an "affine model".

"Affine model" appears to be a conflation of the terms "affine" transform and the transformed ideal "model". That might be used to refer to a model that is subjected to an affine transform.
 
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...

Similar threads