What is meant by implicit/explicit occurrence of a variable?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arroy_0205
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concepts of implicit and explicit occurrences of variables within mathematical functions. An explicit occurrence, as defined, is when a variable can be expressed solely in terms of itself, such as in the function f(x) = x^{1/3} + tanh^{-1}(e^x) + sinh(1/x) + x^x + x log(x), where x appears explicitly. Conversely, in the equation x^y + y^x = 1, x does not have an explicit dependence on y, as y cannot be isolated as a function of x without additional manipulation. This distinction is crucial for understanding variable relationships in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic functions
  • Familiarity with implicit and explicit functions in mathematics
  • Knowledge of variable dependencies in equations
  • Ability to manipulate equations to isolate variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and examples of implicit and explicit functions in calculus
  • Learn techniques for solving implicit equations
  • Explore the use of implicit differentiation in calculus
  • Investigate the role of variable dependencies in multivariable functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of variable relationships in algebraic and calculus contexts.

arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I have not understood what precisely is meant when someone says for example, x occurs implicitly or explicitly in a given function. My vague idea is that if f(x) can be expressed solely as a function of x alone then x is said to be explicitly appearing. Is that correct? For exaple in,
[tex] f(x)=x^{\frac{1}{3}}+\tanh^{-1}e^x+\sinh(\frac{1}{x})+x^x+x \log x[/tex]
I think x appears explicitly.
What about
[tex] x^y+y^x=1[/tex]
I think in this case it is incorrect to say that here x has explicit dependence in y(x). Can anybody make these precise or correct me if I am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We should be able to write any function (of x) in the form y= f(x). In order to determine whether the y in xy+ yx= 1, you have to try to "solve for y". Whether you can or not, y is NOT and "explicit" function of x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K