What is meant by this notation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mohamed el teir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
mohamed el teir
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
when saying the probability distribution of X is f(x) = (3 x) this is to be like vector notation where 3 is above x but i can't write it like this here. what is meant by this notation ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a vecor-like notation for the number of combinations ("n over k") but I don't know if that's what you are referring to:
$$\dbinom 3 x = {3!\over x!\, (3-x)!}$$(to me it seems a bit weird as a probability distribution...)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mohamed el teir
that's right thank you !
i don't know why do they represent probability distributions by this notation
 
This notation is commonly used for binomial distributions.

##\dbinom 3 x## is usually read as "3 choose x", the number of ways of choosing x items from a group of 3 of those items.
 
ProfuselyQuarky said:
That's a combination, right? I haven't done those since last summer.
Yes. It's the number of combinations of 3 things taken x at a time. It's usually read as "3 choose x."
 
FactChecker said:
One problem with that interpretation of the notation is that the distribution function will not total 1. Is it possible that the definition of f(x) is missing a multiplier?
What is the definition of f(x)? The combination term is a coefficient of the probability term for exactly x.
 
mathman said:
What is the definition of f(x)? The combination term is a coefficient of the probability term for exactly x.
The original post stated: "the probability distribution of X is f(x) = (3 x) ". If we interpret that as f(x) = 3Cx, then it does not total 1.
 
I suspect that the OP is completely misreading what is said and that it really is something that involves [itex]\begin{pmatrix}3 \\ x \end{pmatrix}[/itex] such as the binomial distribution with n= 3, [itex]f(x)= \begin{pmatrix}3 \\ x \end{pmatrix} p^x (1- p)^{3- x}[/itex] for x= 0, 1, 2, or 3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
HallsofIvy said:
I suspect that the OP is completely misreading what is said and that it really is something that involves [itex]\begin{pmatrix}3 \\ x \end{pmatrix}[/itex] such as the binomial distribution with n= 3, [itex]f(x)= \begin{pmatrix}3 \\ x \end{pmatrix} p^x (1- p)^{3- x}[/itex] for x= 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Good catch. That has to be it.