I What is Spacelike vs. Timelike Coordinate?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter GR191511
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any coordinate ##x^\mu## has a corresponding coordinate basis vector ##\partial / \partial x^\mu##. The coordinate is called "spacelike", "timelike", or "null" according to the type of its coordinate basis vector. Or, equivalently, according to the type of direction in spacetime that you are moving along a curve in which ##x^\mu## changes but all other coordinates are held constant.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72, vanhees71, topsquark and 3 others
One thing that can be confusing. Suppose we have some coordinates ##t,x,y,z##. And we wish to know if the coordinate x is spacelike, timelike, or null at some point P. To do so, we have to associate the coordinate x with some vector field, and evaluate the length of the vector field at some particular point P. The length of the vector at the particular point P can be classified as time-like, space-like, or null, depending on the sign of the length and the sign convention that one adopts.

However, the answer depends on whether we look at the contravariant vector filed ##\partial_x## = ##\frac{\partial} {\partial x}##, or the covariant vector field dx.

Most PF posters seems to be the convention to look at the vector field ##\partial_x## rather than the covector field dx. But it's clearer to talk about whether a vector field is time-like, space-like, or null at some point P rather than to talk about whether a coordinate is time-like, space-like, or null at some point P, as we need a map from a coordinate to a vector field in order to perform the classification. Of course it also depends on what point P we choose - for instance, in the Schwarzschild coordinates (t,r,##\theta##, ##\phi##), ##\partial_t## is well-known to be a time-like vector outside the event horizion, null at the horizon, and space-like inside the horizon.

Because the Schwarzschild metric is diagonal, dt has the same sign as ##\partial_t##. But this is not true in general. For metrics that are not diagonal, such as the Painleve metrics, the sign of ##\partial_t## and dt can be different.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511 and vanhees71
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top