MHB What is the age of the tree to the nearest year?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the age of a tree using carbon-14 dating, specifically with a sample that contains 62.8% of the carbon-14 found in living matter. The calculations show that the tree is approximately 3,826 years old, derived from the formula for carbon-14 decay. The half-life of carbon-14 is used as 5,700 years to determine the decay rate. Alternative methods involving calculus and differential equations are also mentioned, confirming the same age estimate. Overall, the consensus is that the tree's age is around 3,826 years.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{242.7x.14}$
$\textsf{The charcoal from a tree killed in a volcanic eruption contained 62.8 percent of the carbon-14 found in living matter. }\\$
$\textsf{ How old is the tree to nearest year? Use 5700 years for the half-life of carbon-14}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
1&=2e^k(5700) \therefore k\approx 0.0001 \\
.628\cdot{11400} &= e^{-0.0001(t)}\\
t&=4652 \, \textit{years}
\end{align*}
$\textit{no sure about the 62.8% how to implement it}$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The percentage of $C$ carbon-14 present at time $t$ is:

$$C(t)=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{t}{5700}}$$

Hence:

$$t=\frac{5700\ln\left(\frac{100}{C}\right)}{\ln(2)}$$

Plug in $C=62.8$:

$$t=\frac{5700\ln\left(\frac{100}{62.8}\right)}{\ln(2)}\approx3826$$

Thus, we have found the tree is approximately 3,826 years old.

If we want to actually use calculus, we could set up an IVP from the given information:

$$\d{C}{t}=-kC$$ where $C(0)=100$ and $C(5700)=50$

The ODE is separable, and using the boundaries, we obtain:

$$\int_{100}^{C}\frac{du}{u}=-k\int_0^t\,dv$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{100}{C}\right)=kt$$

$$t=\frac{1}{k}\ln\left(\frac{100}{C}\right)$$

Now, we can use the other given point to determine $k$:

$$5700=\frac{1}{k}\ln\left(\frac{100}{50}\right)\implies k=\frac{\ln(2)}{5700}$$

And so we have:

$$t=\frac{5700\ln\left(\frac{100}{C}\right)}{\ln(2)}$$

As we found above. :D
 
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
0.5&=e^k(5700) \therefore k\approx 0.0001 \\
1/0.628&= e^{k(t)}\\
t&\approx 3826 \, \textit{years}
\end{align*}
$\textit{my jury rigged version}$😰
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
37K