What is the best sky projection to use for my purposes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projection Sky
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting the optimal sky projection for coding a simulation of the moon and sun's movement using Python. The primary recommendation is to utilize a Lambert conformal projection, as it preserves angles and maintains the moon's shape, particularly near the horizon. Additionally, the stereographic projection is suggested as a viable alternative for conserving shapes near a point of interest. Participants express the need for planetarium software that offers a broader range of projections for effective comparison.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Python programming for astronomical simulations
  • Familiarity with Lambert conformal and stereographic projections
  • Knowledge of planetarium software capabilities and limitations
  • Basic concepts of celestial mapping and constellation visualization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research planetarium software that supports multiple sky projections, including Lambert conformal and stereographic
  • Explore Python libraries for astronomical calculations and visualizations
  • Study the mathematical principles behind Lambert conformal and stereographic projections
  • Investigate techniques for creating dynamic constellation maps in Python
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, software developers, and educators interested in celestial simulations and visualizations, particularly those focused on accurate sky projections and constellation mapping.

Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
So basically I want to write some code in Python to project the movement of the moon and sun across the night sky. Basically, I need a projection such that the shape of the moon won't change as it moves in the sky (especially when it's near the horizon) - the objects have to look fairly good rather than ugly and distorted. My postdoc hypothesizes that a Lambert conformal projection (which preserves angles) would be the best projection to use. What are your thoughts?

She also suggested that I try out a variety of projections on planetarium software, although the planetarium software I've downloaded don't have a lot of projections to compare with (in particular, none of them have both a Lambert conformal and a stereographic projection). Is there planetarium software that allows you to experiment with a wide variety of projections? Would a stereographic projection work well (compared to a Lambert conformal projection?)

I think another key thing is this: what we're trying to plot should look more like a constellation map than like a view of the sky from a particular person's perspective.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Most planetarium software that I know of only project the position of astronomical objects. The objects themselves are basically static images that are increased or decreased in size according to the zoom level.

Also, since you mention that the primary purpose of your script is to generate constellation maps, I don't believe that having or not having distorted stars would matter much.

Personally, I would go with stereographic projection, to conserve shapes near a point of interest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K