What is the compatibility condition for the given operators and constants?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The compatibility condition for the operators \(L\) and \(M\) is established as \(L_t + [L,M] = 0\). This is derived from the equations \(L\phi = \lambda\phi\) and \(\phi_t = M\phi\). The analysis shows that \(L_t\phi + LM\phi - \lambda M\phi = 0\) leads to the conclusion that \(L_t + LM - \lambda M = 0\). The discussion also clarifies that \(\lambda\) cannot be equated to \(L\) since they represent different mathematical entities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operator theory in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Inverse Scattering Transform method
  • Basic concepts of Lax pairs in integrable systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of commutators in operator algebra
  • Learn about the Inverse Scattering Transform and its applications
  • Explore Lax pairs and their role in integrable systems
  • Investigate the implications of compatibility conditions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working in the fields of operator theory, quantum mechanics, and integrable systems will benefit from this discussion.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Given
\begin{align}
L\phi &= \lambda\phi\\
\phi_t &= M\phi
\end{align}
where \(L\) and \(M\) are operators and \(\lambda\) a constant.
I want to show the compatibily condition is \(L_t + [L,M] = 0\) where \([,]\) is the commutator.
\[
(L\phi)_t = L_t\phi + L\phi_t = \lambda\phi_t = \lambda M\phi
\]
That is, we have \(L_t\phi + L\phi_t - \lambda M\phi = L_t\phi + LM\phi- \lambda M\phi = 0\).
\begin{align}
[L_t + LM - \lambda M]\phi &= 0\\
L_t + LM - \lambda M &= 0
\end{align}
Can I just let \(\lambda = L\) which doesn't make since sense one is an operator and the other a constant? If not, how do I get the commutator \(LM - ML\) part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I see you are doing the Inverse Scattering Transform with Lax pairs. You have $\lambda M \phi$. Since $\lambda$ is a scalar, rearrange thus: $\lambda M \phi=M(\lambda \phi)=M L \phi$. You can go from there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K