juantheron
- 243
- 1
Find all square matricx $A$ that satisfy the equation $A^2-4A+3I=0$
where $I$ is a Identity matrix
where $I$ is a Identity matrix
The complete set of 2x2 matrices satisfying the equation \(A^2 - 4A + 3I = 0\) includes \(A = I\) and \(A = 3I\) as confirmed solutions. Additionally, matrices of the form \(A = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\) also satisfy the equation, derived using the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem. The discussion highlights that all solutions can be characterized by their characteristic equation \(\lambda^2 - 4\lambda + 3 = 0\) or as multiples of the identity matrix.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in matrix theory and its applications in solving quadratic matrix equations.
jacks said:Find all square matricx $A$ that satisfy the equation $A^2-4A+3I=0$
where $I$ is a Identity matrix
chisigma said:Is...
$\displaystyle A^{2}- 4 A +3 I= A\ (A -4\ I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ (A -3\ I - I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ \{(A-3\ I)- A^{-1}\ (A-3\ I)\}= A\ (A-3\ I)\ (I-A^{-1})$
... so that the A satisfying the given equation also satisfy one of the equations...
$\displaystyle A-3\ I=0$
$\displaystyle A-I=0$
Kind regards
$\chi$ $\sigma$
CaptainBlack said:The quadratic in A can be factorised straight off without having to worry about the existence of inverses. But I'm not sure that we can conclude that if a product is zero then one of the terms in the product is zero in this case.
CB
chisigma said:A trivial test confirms that $A=I$ and $A=3\ I$ are solutions of the equation...
$\displaystyle A^{2}-4\ A+3\ I=0$ (1)
The question is: there are some other solutions to (1)?... it is clear that the question is strictly connected to another question: can exist two matrices X and Y, with $X\ne 0$ and $Y\ne 0$, for whose is $X\ Y=0$?... a very interesting question!...
Kind regards
$\chi$ $\sigma$
jacks said:Thanks to all experts
but my doubt is , is there is any other matrix exists for which $A=\begin{bmatrix}a &b \\
c & d
\end{bmatrix}$ which satisfy $A^2-4A+3I=0$
dwsmith said:Yes.
$$
A = \begin{bmatrix}3&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}
$$
I just used the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem in reverse.
CaptainBlack said:Which is that a matrix \(A\) satisfies its' own characteristics equation:
\[\det (A-\lambda I)=0\]
Which off course allows you to generate many 2x2 solutions of the original equation.
But is that (with the two we already have, which are not restricted to being 2x2) all of them?
CB