MHB What is the Complete Set of 2x2 Matrices Satisfying $A^2-4A+3I=0$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding all 2x2 matrices \(A\) that satisfy the equation \(A^2 - 4A + 3I = 0\). It is established that the matrices \(A = I\) and \(A = 3I\) are solutions, and further exploration reveals that other matrices can also satisfy the equation. A specific example provided is \(A = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\), derived using the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. The conversation also touches on the possibility of other solutions existing and the implications of matrix products equating to zero. Ultimately, the solutions are characterized by their characteristic equations, confirming that multiples of the identity matrix and specific forms can satisfy the original equation.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Find all square matricx $A$ that satisfy the equation $A^2-4A+3I=0$

where $I$ is a Identity matrix
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
Find all square matricx $A$ that satisfy the equation $A^2-4A+3I=0$

where $I$ is a Identity matrix

Is...

$\displaystyle A^{2}- 4 A +3 I= A\ (A -4\ I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ (A -3\ I - I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ \{(A-3\ I)- A^{-1}\ (A-3\ I)\}= A\ (A-3\ I)\ (I-A^{-1})$

... so that the A satisfying the given equation also satisfy one of the equations...

$\displaystyle A-3\ I=0$

$\displaystyle A-I=0$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
Is...

$\displaystyle A^{2}- 4 A +3 I= A\ (A -4\ I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ (A -3\ I - I + 3\ A^{-1})= A\ \{(A-3\ I)- A^{-1}\ (A-3\ I)\}= A\ (A-3\ I)\ (I-A^{-1})$

... so that the A satisfying the given equation also satisfy one of the equations...

$\displaystyle A-3\ I=0$

$\displaystyle A-I=0$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

The quadratic in A can be factorised straight off without having to worry about the existence of inverses. But I'm not sure that we can conclude that if a product is zero then one of the terms in the product is zero in this case.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
The quadratic in A can be factorised straight off without having to worry about the existence of inverses. But I'm not sure that we can conclude that if a product is zero then one of the terms in the product is zero in this case.

CB

A trivial test confirms that $A=I$ and $A=3\ I$ are solutions of the equation...

$\displaystyle A^{2}-4\ A+3\ I=0$ (1)

The question is: there are some other solutions to (1)?... it is clear that the question is strictly connected to another question: can exist two matrices X and Y, with $X\ne 0$ and $Y\ne 0$, for whose is $X\ Y=0$?... a very interesting question!...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
A trivial test confirms that $A=I$ and $A=3\ I$ are solutions of the equation...

$\displaystyle A^{2}-4\ A+3\ I=0$ (1)

The question is: there are some other solutions to (1)?... it is clear that the question is strictly connected to another question: can exist two matrices X and Y, with $X\ne 0$ and $Y\ne 0$, for whose is $X\ Y=0$?... a very interesting question!...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

The answer to the last question is yes:
\[ A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \]
Then \( A^2=0 \)

CB
 
Thanks to all experts

but my doubt is , is there is any other matrix exists for which $A=\begin{bmatrix}a &b \\
c & d
\end{bmatrix}$ which satisfy $A^2-4A+3I=0$
 
jacks said:
Thanks to all experts

but my doubt is , is there is any other matrix exists for which $A=\begin{bmatrix}a &b \\
c & d
\end{bmatrix}$ which satisfy $A^2-4A+3I=0$

Yes.
$$
A = \begin{bmatrix}3&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}
$$

I just used the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem in reverse.
 
dwsmith said:
Yes.
$$
A = \begin{bmatrix}3&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}
$$

I just used the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem in reverse.

Which is that a matrix \(A\) satisfies its' own characteristics equation:

\[\det (A-\lambda I)=0\]

Which off course allows you to generate many 2x2 solutions of the original equation.

But is that (with the two we already have, which are not restricted to being 2x2) all of them?

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
Which is that a matrix \(A\) satisfies its' own characteristics equation:

\[\det (A-\lambda I)=0\]

Which off course allows you to generate many 2x2 solutions of the original equation.

But is that (with the two we already have, which are not restricted to being 2x2) all of them?

CB

OK, I know it is bad form to reply to ones own posts, but:

Let us restrict our attention to 2x2 matrices. We know that \(A\) satisfies its' charateristic equation, which we may write as: \(\lambda^2+b\lambda+c=0\) and so \(A^2+bA+cI=0\), now suppose it also satisfies another second degree equation: \(A^2+\beta A+\gamma I =0\) (which forces \(\beta \ne b\) if these are to be different and consistent).

Then we have: \((b-\beta)A+(c-\gamma)I=0\), and so: \(A=\frac{\gamma-c}{b-\beta}I\)

So the 2x2 solutions to \(A^2-4A+3I=0 \) are either matrices with charateristic equation \(\lambda^2-4\lambda+3=0\) or are multiples of the identity (and so of neccessity the solutions we found by factorising the equation)

CB
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K