What is the concept for solving equations with integer parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtayab1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation 2*[x] - 3*[3x] + 7 = 0, where [x] denotes the integer part of x. Participants explore the implications of the integer part function on potential solutions and the nature of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various values for x, including specific examples like x = 1.07 and x = 1.5, questioning their validity as solutions. There is an exploration of the relationship between [x] and [3x], with some participants suggesting the need for general intervals to find solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and tips regarding the integer part function. There is a recognition of the need to consider different families of intervals for x, and while some participants suggest that only certain intervals may yield solutions, no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integer part function does not behave linearly, as illustrated by examples where [3x] does not equal 3[x]. There is also mention of the need to verify the solution intervals, indicating that assumptions about the ranges of x may need reevaluation.

mtayab1994
Messages
584
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2*[x]-3*[3x]+7=0

Homework Equations



solve for x when [x] is the integer part of the number.

The Attempt at a Solution



To solve it i removed the brackets and got x=1 and then i found the integer part of 1 is 1.

Is it correct? If not is there a concept to solving it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if x = 1.07? Will this be a solution to the equation?
 
what do u mean by what if x=1.07

The integer part of 1.07 is 1 right? so that can be a solution as well and i also thought about have it as x= [1,2[
 
Don't forget that [itex][3x]\ne 3[x][/itex]. For example, if 1.5, then [x]= 1 but 3x= 4.5 so [3x]= 4, not 3. With x= 1.5, 2[x]- 3[3x]+ 7= 2(1)- 3(4)+ 7= 2- 12+ 7= -3, not 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yea thanks for the tip but I'm getting no where with this one at all.
 
What are the largest and smallest values of x that will be solutions to the equation? The solution interval is not [1,2], like you said earlier, since, as HallsofIvy showed, 1.5 is not a solution.
 
You need to use general intervals. Remember that:
[tex] [3 x] = N \in \mathbb{Z}, \; N \le 3 x < N + 1 \Leftrightarrow \frac{N}{3} \le x < \frac{N + 1}{3}[/tex]

So, consider the following 3 families of intervals:
First family:

[tex] N = 3 k, k \le x < k + \frac{1}{3}, \; \mathbb{Z}[/tex]
Then you have:
[tex] [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k[/tex]
and your equation reads:
[tex] 2 k - 3 (3 k) + 7 = 0[/tex]

Second family:
[tex] N = 3 k + 1, k + \frac{1}{3} \le x < k + \frac{2}{3}[/tex]
Then, you have:
[tex] [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k + 1[/tex]
and your equation reads:
[tex] 2 k - 3 ( 3 k + 1) + 7 = 0[/tex]

Third family:
[tex] N = 3 k + 2, k + \frac{2}{3} \le x < k + 1[/tex]
Then you have:
[tex] [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k + 2[/tex]
and your equation reads:
[tex] 2 k - 3 (3 k + 2) + 7 = 0[/tex]

Thus, you get three cases that exhaust the whole set of real numbers and for each case you get an equation. The solution to those equations has to be an integer!
 
Isn't it true that only the first family has a solution?
 
It seems that way, but I wanted the op to check that themselves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K