What is the energy dependence of the Equivalent photon approximation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy dependence of the Equivalent Photon Approximation (EPA) in high-energy physics, specifically regarding its validity at a center of mass energy of 100 TeV. Participants highlight that while the EPA can be a reasonable approximation when the probe energy is sufficiently small compared to other scales in the scattering process, issues arise when other energy scales, such as fermion masses, become comparable to the exchange energy Q². The consensus indicates uncertainty about the EPA's accuracy in high-energy scenarios, particularly for processes like gg->e-e+.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Equivalent Photon Approximation (EPA)
  • Familiarity with center of mass energy concepts in particle physics
  • Knowledge of scattering processes and energy scales (Q²)
  • Basic principles of nucleon/nucleus form factors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of high center of mass energy on the validity of the EPA
  • Study the role of power corrections in high-energy scattering processes
  • Explore the characteristics of nucleon and nucleus form factors, including Woods-Saxon distributions
  • Investigate the photon flux behavior at low Q values in the context of EPA
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students studying scattering processes and the implications of the Equivalent Photon Approximation.

ribella
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
What is the energy dependence of the Equivalent photon approximation? For this approach to be valid, what is the maximum center of mass-energy. As know, this approach is an energy-dependent approach. Can this approach be used to calculate, for example, at a center of mass energy of 100 TeV? Is there any problem with the approach in terms of physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For what type of process do you have in mind?

A probe of the elastic form factor of a nucleon/nucleus? Or something like the inelastic photon pdf of a nucleus?

Typically this is governed by the probe energy / exchange energy Q^2 through the photon its self. If this energy scale is sufficiently small compared to other scales in the scattering process, then it is a decent approximation. If there are other energy scales such as a fermion mass that is mf~Q, then the EPA (assuming the photon is essentially on shell) neglects power corrections of the form Q/mf which can be important for a precision theory description.
 
Thank you for your answer. For example, let's assume that the center of mass energy for the gg->e-e+ process (Here, g is EPA photon) is 100 TeV. In this case, is the EPA approximation valid for the incoming photons at these energies?
 
I would not be confident that the EPA is a good approximation in this case.

(Do you mean the photon photon CoM or the hadronic one? That wasnt clear to me)

Even if the CoM is high, I think it is possible that the cross-section may still be dominated by low-Q (corresponding the virtuality probe of the nucleus/nucleon that is giving you these EPA photons).

Depending if you are considering a nucleus or a nucleon form factor (im not sure what you have in mind exactly) these distributions-the photon flux-may peak at small Q (eg at values below the electron mass). If that were the case, terms like Q/m_electron power corrections are absent in the EPA approach.

Note that a form factor like woods-saxon peaks as Q tends to zero (ie when you resolve the whole photon field of the nucleus).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K