A What is the energy dependence of the Equivalent photon approximation?

ribella
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
What is the energy dependence of the Equivalent photon approximation? For this approach to be valid, what is the maximum center of mass-energy. As know, this approach is an energy-dependent approach. Can this approach be used to calculate, for example, at a center of mass energy of 100 TeV? Is there any problem with the approach in terms of physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For what type of process do you have in mind?

A probe of the elastic form factor of a nucleon/nucleus? Or something like the inelastic photon pdf of a nucleus?

Typically this is governed by the probe energy / exchange energy Q^2 through the photon its self. If this energy scale is sufficiently small compared to other scales in the scattering process, then it is a decent approximation. If there are other energy scales such as a fermion mass that is mf~Q, then the EPA (assuming the photon is essentially on shell) neglects power corrections of the form Q/mf which can be important for a precision theory description.
 
Thank you for your answer. For example, let's assume that the center of mass energy for the gg->e-e+ process (Here, g is EPA photon) is 100 TeV. In this case, is the EPA approximation valid for the incoming photons at these energies?
 
I would not be confident that the EPA is a good approximation in this case.

(Do you mean the photon photon CoM or the hadronic one? That wasnt clear to me)

Even if the CoM is high, I think it is possible that the cross-section may still be dominated by low-Q (corresponding the virtuality probe of the nucleus/nucleon that is giving you these EPA photons).

Depending if you are considering a nucleus or a nucleon form factor (im not sure what you have in mind exactly) these distributions-the photon flux-may peak at small Q (eg at values below the electron mass). If that were the case, terms like Q/m_electron power corrections are absent in the EPA approach.

Note that a form factor like woods-saxon peaks as Q tends to zero (ie when you resolve the whole photon field of the nucleus).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top