What is the equation for finding the position of an elevator at any given time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flouran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the position of an elevator over time, given a scenario involving a mass, force, and acceleration. The original poster presents a problem involving the calculation of the elevator's position using integrals of acceleration derived from net force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the position equation through double integration of acceleration, questioning the validity of their results from a trapezoidal approximation in Excel. Some participants suggest that assumptions about constant acceleration may simplify the problem, while others emphasize the complexity due to variable acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different assumptions and approaches to the problem, with some providing guidance on integral forms to use. There is recognition of the challenges posed by non-constant acceleration, and suggestions for clarification in the original poster's explanation of the problem context.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific constraints such as the use of an Excel spreadsheet with time intervals and net force data, indicating that acceleration is not constant. This adds complexity to the problem and influences the discussion on how to approach the calculations.

flouran
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
1. Mass is hung from a force probe, with negative force calibrated as down. The mass is 0.5 kg, the height of each floor is 5 m, and v0 = a0 = 0. Assume that I start on the 6th floor, what floors did I stop on, and how long was I on each floor?
2. I was wondering, how would one find the position of the elevator at any time as an equation?
[tex]a(t) &=& \frac{Fnet}{m}[/tex]
[tex]v(t) &=& {\int_{t_0}^{t_final} a(t) dt = {\int_{t_0}^{t_final} (\frac{Fnet}{m}) dt[/tex]
[tex]x(t) &=& {\int_{t_0}^{t_final}v(t)dt = {\int_{t_0}^{t_final}}{\int_{t_0}^{t_final} a(t) dtdt} = {\int_{0}^{t_final}}{\int_{0}^{t_final}(\frac{Fnet}{0.5}) dtdt[/tex]

[tex]Floor(t) &=& \frac{\int_{0}^{t_final}{\int_{0}^{t_final}(\frac{Fnet}{0.5}) dtdt + 30}{5}[/tex]

3. My idea was the the position is the double integral of acceleration, which is Fnet/m, with respect to time. Where Fnet is the instantaneous net force at time t. But, on excel I got weird numbers, when I did a trapezoidal approximation. Am I doing anything wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aah ,you'd have to make a lot of assumptions before approaching such a problem in a practical manner...But assuming all ideal situations that no friction,you know no energy losses,there is no intermidiate stopping that is it is a point to point transportation,constant accelarations and all the rest that you are used to in textbooks,then we can simplify and look at it it through 2 situations..Going down where total accelaration A(down)=a(1) + g and going up where total acceration A(up)=a(2)- g...where g=gravitational accelaration,a(1)=accelaration due to elevator machine going down and a(2)=accelaration due to elevator machine going up...previously I made an assumption all these are constants and independent such that you can perform the double integral with complete ease..and in some situations even assume a(1)=a(2)!...keep in mind,this is very impractical,I don't see a practical possibility without few assumptions or involving complex multivariate functions,who wants the trouble when we got digital systems to tell positions at any and all times t's!
 
You see, the teacher gave us an excel spreadsheet with the time at 0.1s intervals, and the net force as well at those corresponding intervals. From there we need to answer those two questions. Thus, acceleration IS NOT CONSTANT, that's why I have to use complex multivariate formulas.
 
Ooh am sorry you hadnt explained that!...My bad!But you should be more descriptive,its not easy to know that accelaration is not constant if note that out in the 1st place..try to Use this integral for x(t)=$ ($[Fnet/m] dt)dt where $=definite integral sign from t=0 to t...
 
Ooh am sorry you hadnt explained that!...My bad!But you should be more descriptive,its not easy to know that accelaration is not constant if note that out in the 1st place..try to Use this integral for x(t)=$ ($[Fnet/m] dt)dt where $=definite integral sign from t=0 to t...Then use the analytical methods the teacher instructed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K