MHB What is the equation that guarantees a non-real root for every real number p?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that the equation $8x^4-16x^3+16x^2-8x+p=0$ has at least one non-real root for every real number $p$ and find the sum of all the non-real roots of the equation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solution suggested by other:
By substituting $x=m+\dfrac{1}{2}$ into the equation yields $8m^4+4m^2+p-\dfrac{3}{2}=0$.

Using the substitution skill one more time (by letting $n=m^2$), we get a quadratic equation in $n$:

$8n^2+4n+p-\dfrac{3}{2}=0$

Solving for $n$ by employing the quadratic formula we get

$n_1=\dfrac{-1+\sqrt{2(2-p)}}{4}$ and $n_2=\dfrac{-1-\sqrt{2(2-p)}}{4}$

If we want real $m$ values, we need $n \ge 0$.

Obviously $n_2=\dfrac{-1-\sqrt{2(2-p)}}{4} <0$, hence it gives only non-real values for $m$ for all real $p$.

Therefore, we can conclude that the equation $8x^4-16x^3+16x^2-8x+p=0$ has at least one non-real root for every real number $p$.
Now, for the second part of the problem, we are asked to find the sum of all the non-real roots of the equation.

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 900"]
[TR]
[TD]For $p \le \dfrac{3}{2}$:[/TD]
[TD]For $p>\dfrac{3}{2}$:[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]If we want $n_1=\dfrac{-1+\sqrt{2(2-p)}}{4}>0$, this is true when $p \le\dfrac{3}{2}$.

That means, the original equation $8x^4-16x^3+16x^2-8x+p=0$ has 2 real roots and 2 non-real roots and its non-real roots take the form $x=m+\dfrac{1}{2}$, where $m=\sqrt{n}=\sqrt{\text{negative value}}=ai$.

The sum of the 2 non-real roots therefore is $\left(ai+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)+\left(-ai+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)=1$.[/TD]
[TD]We will get $n_1=\dfrac{-1+\sqrt{2(2-p)}}{4}<0$.

That means, the original equation $8x^4-16x^3+16x^2-8x+p=0$ has all 4 non-real roots and its non-real roots take the form $x=m_1+\dfrac{1}{2}$ and $x=m_2+\dfrac{1}{2}$, where $m_1=\sqrt{n}=\sqrt{\text{negative value}}=ci$ and $m_2=\sqrt{n}=\sqrt{\text{negative value}}=di$

The sum of the 4 non-real roots therefore is $\left(ci+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)+\left(-ci+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)+\left(di+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)+\left(-di+\dfrac{1}{2} \right)=2$.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Therefore we get:

$\displaystyle \text{the sum of non-real roots}=\begin{cases}1 & \text{for p} \le \dfrac{3}{2} \\2 & p > \dfrac{3}{2}\\ \end{cases}$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top