What is the Equivalent Strength of the Chicxulub Impact in Atomic Bombs?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KingGambit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Bomb Unit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Chicxulub impact is estimated to have released energy equivalent to more than 10 billion atomic bombs, specifically referencing the Hiroshima bomb, which had an energy yield of approximately 15 kilotons. In comparison, a magnitude 8.9 earthquake releases around 1018 joules of energy, which is a million times greater than the Hiroshima bomb. The discussion emphasizes the importance of specifying which atomic bomb is referenced in such comparisons, as vague statements can lead to misunderstandings about energy scales.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy units such as joules and kilotons
  • Familiarity with seismic energy and earthquake magnitudes
  • Knowledge of historical atomic bomb yields, particularly Hiroshima
  • Basic principles of energy comparison across different phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the energy release of the Chicxulub impact and its geological significance
  • Explore the differences in energy calculations between various atomic bombs
  • Learn about the methods used to measure seismic energy in earthquakes
  • Investigate the historical context and impact of the Hiroshima atomic bomb
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the comparative energy scales of natural disasters and nuclear events.

KingGambit
Messages
54
Reaction score
46
Hi PF Forum,
How are you guys. I hope you guys are doing fine.
I often come a statement like this.
This earthquake is as strong as 1 million atomic bombs.
This volcano is as strong as some million atomic bombs.

And now in this video.
Chicxulub impact
"... this impact carried more than 10 billion atomic bombs."
Which of the atomic bomb that it refers to?
Little boy, Trinity, Fat man, Tsar Bomba?
I mean, I know 1 unit calorie is something like 4.2 joules
or
1 PSI is approximately 7000 pascal, 1 ton TNT = 1 billion calories
Thanks for your attentions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't watch your video right now, but references should specify, and the first hit on Google used Hiroshima:
Finally in this section, it is interesting to compare the energy produced by earthquakes with other energy sources. The amount of energy released by the Hiroshima nuclear bomb was about 1012 J, whereas one magnitude 8.9 earthquake released about 1018 J of seismic energy (Figure 9). This is a million times more energy (i.e. a factor of 106) than the Hiroshima bomb. The amount of energy used every day in the UK is somewhat more than 1016 J

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/geology/earthquakes/content-section-4.3

Hiroshima is a "good" choice because it was actually used so it caused actual damage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and KingGambit
In general when I see a video or read a text that uses such vague information - I don't believe it, as apparently whoever recorded/wrote it didn't understand basics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit and BillTre
KingGambit said:
Hi PF Forum,
How are you guys. I hope you guys are doing fine.
I often come a statement like this.
This earthquake is as strong as 1 million atomic bombs.
This volcano is as strong as some million atomic bombs.

And now in this video.
Chicxulub impact
"... this impact carried more than 10 billion atomic bombs."
Which of the atomic bomb that it refers to?
Little boy, Trinity, Fat man, Tsar Bomba?
I mean, I know 1 unit calorie is something like 4.2 joules
or
1 PSI is approximately 7000 pascal, 1 ton TNT = 1 billion calories
Thanks for your attentions.

russ_watters said:
I can't watch your video right now, but references should specify, and the first hit on Google used Hiroshima:


https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/geology/earthquakes/content-section-4.3

Hiroshima is a "good" choice because it was actually used so it caused actual damage.

Borek said:
In general when I see a video or read a text that uses such vague information - I don't believe it, as apparently whoever recorded/wrote it didn't understand basics.
See: "Sverdrup;" an "FYI."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit
FYI, with not much googling you can verify the math. The wiki article for the asteroid says 72 teratonnes, or 10^12. Hiroshima was 15 kilotons, so it looks like 4.8 billion of them to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
7K