What is the Equivalent Strength of the Chicxulub Impact in Atomic Bombs?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KingGambit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Bomb Unit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy comparison between the Chicxulub impact and atomic bombs, specifically questioning which atomic bomb is being referenced in claims about the impact's strength. Participants explore the validity of such comparisons and the underlying calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Technical explanation, Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about vague comparisons of energy, suggesting that the lack of specificity undermines credibility.
  • One participant notes that the Hiroshima bomb is often used as a reference point for such comparisons due to its historical significance and actual damage caused.
  • Another participant provides a calculation based on the energy of the Chicxulub impact, suggesting it could be equivalent to approximately 4.8 billion Hiroshima bombs, based on the estimated energy release of 72 teratonnes.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the claims made in videos or texts that use broad statements without clear references.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the comparisons or the specific atomic bomb reference. There is a mix of skepticism and attempts to clarify the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of specifying which atomic bomb is referenced and the potential for misunderstanding due to vague statements. The discussion includes various energy measurements and their implications for comparisons.

KingGambit
Messages
54
Reaction score
46
Hi PF Forum,
How are you guys. I hope you guys are doing fine.
I often come a statement like this.
This earthquake is as strong as 1 million atomic bombs.
This volcano is as strong as some million atomic bombs.

And now in this video.
Chicxulub impact
"... this impact carried more than 10 billion atomic bombs."
Which of the atomic bomb that it refers to?
Little boy, Trinity, Fat man, Tsar Bomba?
I mean, I know 1 unit calorie is something like 4.2 joules
or
1 PSI is approximately 7000 pascal, 1 ton TNT = 1 billion calories
Thanks for your attentions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't watch your video right now, but references should specify, and the first hit on Google used Hiroshima:
Finally in this section, it is interesting to compare the energy produced by earthquakes with other energy sources. The amount of energy released by the Hiroshima nuclear bomb was about 1012 J, whereas one magnitude 8.9 earthquake released about 1018 J of seismic energy (Figure 9). This is a million times more energy (i.e. a factor of 106) than the Hiroshima bomb. The amount of energy used every day in the UK is somewhat more than 1016 J

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/geology/earthquakes/content-section-4.3

Hiroshima is a "good" choice because it was actually used so it caused actual damage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and KingGambit
In general when I see a video or read a text that uses such vague information - I don't believe it, as apparently whoever recorded/wrote it didn't understand basics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit and BillTre
KingGambit said:
Hi PF Forum,
How are you guys. I hope you guys are doing fine.
I often come a statement like this.
This earthquake is as strong as 1 million atomic bombs.
This volcano is as strong as some million atomic bombs.

And now in this video.
Chicxulub impact
"... this impact carried more than 10 billion atomic bombs."
Which of the atomic bomb that it refers to?
Little boy, Trinity, Fat man, Tsar Bomba?
I mean, I know 1 unit calorie is something like 4.2 joules
or
1 PSI is approximately 7000 pascal, 1 ton TNT = 1 billion calories
Thanks for your attentions.

russ_watters said:
I can't watch your video right now, but references should specify, and the first hit on Google used Hiroshima:


https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/geology/earthquakes/content-section-4.3

Hiroshima is a "good" choice because it was actually used so it caused actual damage.

Borek said:
In general when I see a video or read a text that uses such vague information - I don't believe it, as apparently whoever recorded/wrote it didn't understand basics.
See: "Sverdrup;" an "FYI."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit
FYI, with not much googling you can verify the math. The wiki article for the asteroid says 72 teratonnes, or 10^12. Hiroshima was 15 kilotons, so it looks like 4.8 billion of them to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
7K