What is the error analysis for a function of Newton's cooling law?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the error analysis of a function derived from Newton's cooling law, particularly focusing on the time constant and its implications in measuring uncertainty. Participants explore the treatment of variables in the context of partial derivatives and the calculation of uncertainties related to time and temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to treat the function as a two-variable function of the time constant (tau) and time, suggesting that partial derivatives should be taken with respect to both variables.
  • Another participant argues that tau should not be treated as a variable for differentiation, proposing it may be a parameter instead.
  • A later post clarifies that the uncertainty to be measured pertains to the time constant, raising questions about the appropriate value of time to use in derivatives.
  • One participant describes their process of data fitting using the Levenberg Marquardt algorithm to determine tau and seeks methods for calculating the uncertainty of tau.
  • Another participant suggests using the total differential approach to relate changes in tau and time to the function.
  • There is confusion about how time appears in derivatives and what specific value of time should be used in calculations.
  • Participants express uncertainty about how to express tau as a function of temperature and time for further calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the treatment of tau as a variable or parameter, and there is no consensus on the best approach to calculate the uncertainty of tau.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of differentiating with respect to tau and time, and there are unresolved questions about the appropriate values to use in calculations, as well as the dependencies on definitions of variables.

dziech
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi guys,

I have a silly question, but I seem to be confused about it. Let's say I have a function of Newton's cooling law. I measured the exponential drop of the temperature of some system and now I want to make an error analysis. Do I treat this function as a two variable function of tau (time constant in exponent) and time ? If yes, according to the error analysis I need to take partial derivatives over time and tau. This results in having time as a product in df/dtau result. Shall this be a measured time of the temperature falling to the constant level ?

In equations :

## \frac{df(\tau,t)}{d\tau} = \tau e^{-\tau t} ##
## \frac{df(\tau,t)}{dt} = t e^{-\tau t }##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dziech said:
Hi guys,

I have a silly question, but I seem to be confused about it. Let's say I have a function of Newton's cooling law. I measured the exponential drop of the temperature of some system and now I want to make an error analysis. Do I treat this function as a two variable function of tau (time constant in exponent) and time ? If yes, according to the error analysis I need to take partial derivatives over time and tau. This results in having time as a product in df/dtau result. Shall this be a measured time of the temperature falling to the constant level ?

In equations :

## \frac{df(\tau,t)}{d\tau} = \tau e^{-\tau t} ##
## \frac{df(\tau,t)}{dt} = t e^{-\tau t }##
Since ##\tau## is a time constant (your words), it's not a variable, so don't differentiate with respect to it. It could be that here ##\tau## is a parameter, a value that can have different values for different scenarios, but isn't considered to be a variable.
 
I asked my question in a wrong way. The uncertainty i want to measure is the one if the time constant. Then it's a function of tine and temperature. The question remains, is the t value that stays in derivative a value over i made my calculations? It makes sense if i take the uncertainty of the arguments and multiply them by time so kind of number of samples.
 
dziech said:
I asked my question in a wrong way. The uncertainty i want to measure is the one if the time constant.
If the time constant is what? This isn't a complete thought.
dziech said:
Then it's a function of tine and temperature. The question remains, is the t value that stays in derivative a value over i made my calculations?
I don't understand what you're asking.
dziech said:
It makes sense if i take the uncertainty of the arguments and multiply them by time so kind of number of samples.
I don't understand this either.
 
Ok, maybe more context will help : )

I have samples of a solid cooling down. I do data fitting with Levenberg Marquardt algorithm to find ##\tau## - time constant of the exponential function. Now I want to calculate the uncertainty of the time constant ##\tau##. Let's put it simple - what are the possibilities to do that ?
 
OK, that's clearer. The bit about a time constant threw me off, since it's not actually known.

I guess I would approach this as f being a function of both t and ##\tau##.

The total differential, df, would be
$$df \approx \frac{\partial f}{\partial \tau}\cdot \Delta \tau + \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \cdot \Delta t$$
 
Yes, sorry, sometimes I forget to keep things straight forward : )

Ok, great - this is exactly where I got stuck: the derivative with respect to ##\tau## will in the end include time wouldn't it ? So :
## f = T_{ambient} + (T(0)-T_{ambient})e^{-kt}##
Now I keep the t as a constant (if I understand correctly) and :
##\frac{df}{d\tau} \Delta\tau= -t(T(0)-T_{ambient})\Delta\tau##

I am confused what t is in my example ?

But the question still remains how to calculate the ##\Delta\tau##. I got this parameter from data fitting. I just wonder if I can turn the function around so that the ##\tau(T,t)## and then calculate ##\Delta\tau##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K