MHB What is the Exact Amount My Friend Owes Me for Our 50% Partnership Investment?

tahir1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
It's a real life math question and this seems the best place to ask.

Me and my friend started a business together on 50% partnership bases. (cost divided by both and profit shared by both).
My friend was lacking some money, so I added additional amount to cover his share.

It's a garments business and been a month sale is going on. The money gathered by sale is re-invested. Now, how much my friend owes me has gone complicated (for me). Here is how I am trying to solve it:

A: Total investment in purchase: 997,660
B: Total cost (rent, salaries etc): 390,652
C: Total sale (including profit): 377,540
D: Total profit: 64,937
E: Net sale (excluding profit): 312,603
F: Friend's investment: 440,000
G: Total Expenses: 1,388,312From that ahead, I'm totally confused how to calculate the exact amount my friend needs to pay in order to us both get 50% investment. The figures change on daily basis as sale, purchase and expenses are going on.

Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tahir said:
Hi,
It's a real life math question and this seems the best place to ask.

Me and my friend started a business together on 50% partnership bases. (cost divided by both and profit shared by both).
My friend was lacking some money, so I added additional amount to cover his share.

It's a garments business and been a month sale is going on. The money gathered by sale is re-invested. Now, how much my friend owes me has gone complicated (for me). Here is how I am trying to solve it:

A: Total investment in purchase: 997,660
B: Total cost (rent, salaries etc): 390,652
C: Total sale (including profit): 377,540
D: Total profit: 64,937
How did you arrive at any profit at all if "total sale" was less than "total cost" (which apparently does not include "total investment". How are you amortizing that?)

E: Net sale (excluding profit): 312,603
F: Friend's investment: 440,000
G: Total Expenses: 1,388,312From that ahead, I'm totally confused how to calculate the exact amount my friend needs to pay in order to us both get 50% investment. The figures change on daily basis as sale, purchase and expenses are going on.

Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
 
It's a garments retail business. Products are bought at wholesale price and sold at retail price.
For example, a product price is 200 (wholesale), markup is 30% so its sold on 260.

Terminology "Net sale" refers here to 200. Total sale means 260 and 60 is considered profit.

We are not taking out and distributing profit just yet. Its too early for that, instead we're re-circulating the money adding more items.Issue is, due to sale and additional money being added, it is confusing how to calculate that how much my partner needs to add in order to get us both equal amount invested. Thats allHope I am clear enough?
 
The only line that matters is:
"A: Total investment in purchase: 997,660"

Each of you contributed 997,660/2 = 498,830
Your friend borrowed from you in order to make up his share.

Doesn't matter if the business makes money or not:
he owes you whatever amount he borrowed from you.

The purpose of your question is unclear:
are you asking that we act as your accountant,
figure out the NET revenue, then decide what
your "friend" owes you?

If you contributed 75% of investment, then it's simple enough:
you get 75% of revenue, friend gets 25%.

Word of caution:
friends remain friends until they go in business together :)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top