A What is the fatigue limit for copper pipe with a factor of safety of 5?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter MysticDream
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the fatigue limit for copper piping with a factor of safety of 5, specifically under external gas pressure cycles of 300 cycles per minute. The user seeks information on the slope of the fatigue curve beyond 100 million cycles, ideally up to a billion cycles, to assess service life before failure. The copper pipe has an outer diameter of 0.625 inches and a wall thickness of 0.028 inches, with pressure cycling between 300 and 350 psi. Comparisons are drawn to electrical conductors, noting their much higher factors of safety due to lower stress levels. The user requests insights or data on mechanical degradation related to continuous cycling.
MysticDream
Messages
112
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Trying to estimate the fatigue limit for very low stress.
I’m wanting to estimate the fatigue limit for copper piping that has a factor of safety of about 5 (yield FOS). All I can find online is graphs of curves that go to about 100 million cycles, but I need more. Obviously for these materials that don’t have a distinct fatigue limit like steel, the slope of the curve goes more horizontal as stress levels decrease, but I want to know what the slope is up to a billion cycles if possible. This piping will be subjected to external gas pressure cycles of 300 cycles per min, 24/7. That means after one year, it will have gone through about 157,680,000 cycles. I need to have a reasonable estimate of how long these would be in service before they fail from fatigue. If anyone has any insight into this, I’d greatly appreciate any assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think electrical conductors see 50 Hz continuously (in UK at least) for many decades. Perhaps there is some data about any mechanical degradation evidenced from this. How big is the pressure and the pipe?
 
  • Like
Likes MysticDream
hutchphd said:
I would think electrical conductors see 50 Hz continuously (in UK at least) for many decades. Perhaps there is some data about any mechanical degradation evidenced from this. How big is the pressure and the pipe?
Yeah, that’s a good point, but that max stress is probably way lower than the max stress in my design with a FOS of 5. Electrical conductors probably have a FOS of 100 or more given that the stress it’s subjected to is so small.

The pipe is .625” OD with a wall of .028”. The min and max external pressure in the cycle is from 300 to 350 psi. An FEA showed a yield FOS around 5 for that max pressure of 350.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top