Crack Length & Safety Factor: Understanding Acceptable Limits for Cyclic Loading

  • Thread starter richard9678
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Safety
In summary, the conversation discussed a component classified as an infinite plate with a maximum working stress of 50% of its yield strength. The plate has a crack that is 10.5mm long and is being subjected to cyclic loading in mode 1. The question was whether the crack is acceptable and at what length it would exceed the safety factor. The formula acritical = [ kIC / Y x σ ]2 was used to calculate the critical stress at which the crack would become a cleavage fracture. It was determined that the critical crack length is 43.29mm. The next step was to determine the crack length that should not be exceeded, which was found to be 27.07mm assuming the load was doubled.
  • #1
richard9678
93
7
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Help Template is shown
I'm not getting something, I'm looking for some hints.Component classified as in infinite plate. Maximum working stress is 50% of yield strength. Has crack 10.5mm long. Cyclic loading - mode 1.

Is the crack acceptable?
At what length the growing crack exceeds the safety factor?

I just want hints as to how to answer the questions.

I can calculate the crack length at which the working load leads to a sigma critical point. That's greater than 10.5mm. Okay, so there no imminent danger of cleavage fracture. But, that is not to say the crack is acceptable.

There must some point where the crack length puts it within a margin of safety. But, I'm lost to understand this.

I'm guessing that 10.5mm is beyond some safety factor. That there is a length smaller than 10.5mm which is acceptable. Just don't know how to get to it. Need some key words or something to help me. Thanks.

P.S. Possibly talking about residual strength - not sure. Might be something else.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If I say that the working load is doubled, then using my formula, I get a much smaller crack length where cleavage fracture would occur.

So, I get acritical = 13mm when load is 287.5 MPa - the designed load. I get that down to 3mm if I say the load is doubled to 575 MPa. And the current crack length is 10.5mm.

I'd be saying 3mm is the safety factor because I can stand a load of 575 MPa - twice the working load (Incidentally equal to Yield Strength). That's a safety factor of two.

So, the crack is unacceptable, because it's longer than 3mm. And the crack exceeds the safety factor by 7.5mm .

Best I can do. I could be wrong.
 
  • #3
Sorry but your postings as written are practically gibberish .

Please try to explain your problem more clearly and tell us what understanding of strength of materials and stress analysis you have so that any answers can be pitched at the right level .
 
  • #4
We have a metal plate, which can be considered infinite, and in it is a crack of 10.5mm from the edge. At a certain critical stress the crack will suddenly open up, very fast, which is a cleavage fracture. The value of that critical stress is a function of the crack length (a). I believe the following formula will give you the critical stress, the stress at which cleavage fracture will commence: acritical = [ kIC / Y x σ ]2.

Using that formula, I get a critical crack length of 43.29 mm, meaning the crack will become a cleavage fracture at the working load (287.5 MN m-2), if it gets to 43.29 mm.

Assuming everything is okay so far. the next thing is to figure out what length of crack would represent a safety factor boundary. Clearly we must not let the crack be anywhere near 43.29mm. To come up with the crack length that should not be exceeded, I imagined that the load was twice the working load. And used the above formula. That gave a crack length of 27.07mm. So, my reasoning is, with a crack that is 27.07mm, the working load represents half the load that would produce a cleavage fracture. And that to my mind is a safety factor of 2.

I wonder if all this passes muster.

kIC was 104 MN =3/2 and Y was 1.12.

P.S. Just ignore post # 2. Figures are wrong.
 

What are cracks and why are they a safety concern?

Cracks are fractures or discontinuities in a material that can weaken its structural integrity. They can occur naturally or due to external factors such as stress or fatigue. Cracks are a safety concern because they can lead to structural failure or unexpected collapse, especially in critical infrastructure like buildings, bridges, and aircraft.

How do cracks form?

Cracks can form due to a variety of reasons including stress, fatigue, corrosion, and manufacturing defects. Overloading or repeated stress on a material can cause cracks to form and propagate over time. Environmental factors like moisture and temperature changes can also contribute to crack formation.

What is a safety factor and why is it important?

A safety factor is a measure of how much stronger a structure or material is compared to the maximum load it is expected to withstand. It is calculated by dividing the maximum expected load by the minimum required strength. A higher safety factor indicates a greater margin of safety and reduces the risk of structural failure.

How is the safety factor calculated?

The safety factor is calculated by dividing the maximum expected load by the minimum required strength. The maximum expected load is determined through analysis and testing, while the minimum required strength is based on the material's properties and design standards. A safety factor of 1 or less indicates that a structure or material is at risk of failure, while a safety factor of 2 or more is considered safe.

How can cracks be detected and prevented?

Cracks can be detected through visual inspections, non-destructive testing techniques such as ultrasonic testing, and stress monitoring. To prevent cracks from forming, proper design and construction techniques should be followed, and regular maintenance and inspections should be conducted to identify and address potential sources of stress or damage.

Similar threads

  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
3
Replies
100
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
8K
Back
Top