What is the formula for calculating wave speed through a gas?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The formula for calculating wave speed through a gas is defined by the equation v = (frequency)(wavelength). In the discussion, the user attempted to calculate the wavelength using the equation .03 = wavelength/2, resulting in a wavelength of .06. However, the user encountered issues with the calculation of wave speed, which was ultimately determined to be 719.76 m/s using a frequency of 11996 Hz. The discussion highlights the importance of considering changes in length when evaluating wave properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and properties
  • Familiarity with the relationship between frequency and wavelength
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of gas behavior in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of temperature and pressure on wave speed in gases
  • Learn about the Doppler effect and its impact on frequency measurements
  • Explore advanced wave equations in different mediums
  • Study the principles of resonance and standing waves
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, engineers working with acoustics, and anyone interested in understanding wave behavior in gases.

road_runner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Screen shot 2011-03-15 at 3.50.00 PM.png


I tried finding lambda:
.03 = wavelength/2 --> wavelength = (.03)(2) = .06

Then plugging that into the equation
v = (frequency)(wavelength) --> v = (11996)(.06) = 719.76

But that didn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello road_runner,

Welcome to Physics Forums!
road_runner said:
I tried finding lambda:
.03 = wavelength/2 --> wavelength = (.03)(2) = .06

[...]

But that didn't work.
Reevaluate the comparative length of the path LYM, when the section is pulled out by 0.03 m. The LYM section can be broken up into two parts: the length of the top part and the length of the bottom part.

When the sliding section is pulled out, the LYM distance increases by 0.03 m due to the increase in length of the top part, and yet another 0.03 m care of the bottom part. :wink:
 
Last edited:
Ahhh ok! Thanks a million! Never even considered that the length changes in both parts...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
843
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K