I What is the Freeze-Out Temperature of WIMP Particles?

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
TL;DR Summary
Is the epoch of freeze-out temperature for wimps particles is the same as for neutrinos.
Why the wimps freeze-out happened earlier.
I'm studying the freeze-out moment of different particles and I have few questions that I can't find answer about the Wimp particles.

First of all, the freeze-out temperature of the wimp particles is around 0.4-40gev much higher than 1 mev for the neutrinos.
Thus, that means that the freeze-out moment for the wimp particles happened earlier, but why exactly? It it related with the mass of the wimp particles?

Also, does it means that the freeze-out moment happened during the radiation dominated epoch?

secondly, are the wimp particles moving at the speed of light, because I see that in the relation "rate of scattering-Hubble parameter" they use v=c=1.

For example, https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~philipsen/homepage_files/graz.pdf the author seems to use c=1. I might be wrong though.
Also, using the relation in the link above (p.10) ##n G_f^2 m_q^2 = \frac{T^2}{m_p}##, I don't see how the author get a relation for the temperature-mass using his expression, same for the neutrinos.

There are a lot of questions. I hope they are clear.

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
Freeze out happens when T ≈ m.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Freeze out happens when T ≈ m.
Someone should tell the CNB neutrinos ... 😏
 
  • Haha
Likes Vanadium 50
happyparticle said:
First of all, the freeze-out temperature of the wimp particles is around 0.4-40gev much higher than 1 mev for the neutrinos.
First of all, you should write your units appropriately. There is a difference between GeV and gev and there is a difference between MeV and mev, which may be misunderstood as meV (which is 9 orders of magnitude smaller than MeV).

happyparticle said:
Thus, that means that the freeze-out moment for the wimp particles happened earlier, but why exactly? It it related with the mass of the wimp particles?
Yes. I may have smirked a bit about the mass comment above, but there is a difference in the freeze out of relativistic species and non-relativistic species. If temperature drops to the point of a species becoming non-relativistic, then its equilibrium abundance becomes Boltzmann suppressed. This leads to the abundance quickly dropping off, leading to fewer interactions than what you would expect from a relativistic species and therefore facilitating the freeze out.

Meanwhile, a relativistic species (such as neutrinos at freeze out) does not have its abundance Boltzmann suppressed and will not freeze out due to the abundance dropping. This should be covered in any basic textbook such as Kolb & Turner.
 
  • Like
Likes happyparticle, Bandersnatch and topsquark
All right. Thank you. It took me some time to really understand. Your answer helped me. Thanks again.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
225
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Back
Top