What is the function g(x) given h=g \circ f and f(x)=x+1, h(x)=x^3+3x+1?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the function g(x) given the composition h = g ∘ f, where f(x) = x + 1 and h(x) = x^3 + 3x + 1. Participants explore the relationship between these functions and the implications of their degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of g being a polynomial and consider the degrees of f and h to infer the degree of g. There are suggestions to express g in terms of a polynomial and to equate coefficients to find unknowns.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in determining coefficients for g(x) through polynomial expansion and substitution methods. There is ongoing exploration of different approaches, including the use of specific values to simplify calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of directly finding g(x) and consider whether guessing or trying different methods is necessary. There is mention of using substitutions to facilitate the process without expanding the polynomial fully.

Дьявол
Messages
365
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the function g(x), if there are [itex]h=g \circ f[/itex]

f(x)=x+1, [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] and [itex]h(x)=x^3+3x+1[/itex]

Homework Equations



[tex](g \circ f)(x)=g(f(x))=h(x)[/tex]

[tex]f \circ g \neq g \circ f[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]h=g \circ f[/tex]

[tex]h(x)=g(f(x))[/tex]

[tex]x^3+3x+1=g(x+1)[/tex]

Is there any way that I will directly find the result of g(x), or I should guess and try some things? I tried something at home, but useless. Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


My guess is g is going to be a polynomial. You can use the degree of f and h to find what the degree of g is going to be, then plug f into a generic polynomial of that degree and see what conditions the coefficients have to satisfy
 


Well, you can figure g ought to be a polynomial function of degree 3, right? So put g(x+1)=A(x+1)^3+B(x+1)^2+C(x+1)+D. If you set that equal to x^3+3x+1, can you find A,B,C and D? You should get four equations in four unknowns if you equate the powers of x. Of course, you can also be clever and pick some special values of x that might make the job easier (like x=-1).
 


Thanks for the posts.

I found A=1, B=-3, C=6, D=-3.
[tex]g(x+1)=(x+1)^3-3(x+1)^2+6(x+1)-3[/tex]
So
[tex]g(x)=x^3-3x^2+6x-3[/tex]

Yes it is correct.

How will x=-1 make the job easier?
 


Дьявол said:
Thanks for the posts.

I found A=1, B=-3, C=6, D=-3.
[tex]g(x+1)=(x+1)^3-3(x+1)^2+6(x+1)-3[/tex]
So
[tex]g(x)=x^3-3x^2+6x-3[/tex]

Yes it is correct.

How will x=-1 make the job easier?

If you put x=-1, you get D=-3 directly. You can also see A must be 1 without doing any any algebra. So you really only need to solve for B and C.
 


Дьявол said:
[tex]x^3+3x+1=g(x+1)[/tex]

Is there any way that I will directly find the result of g(x), or I should guess and try some things? I tried something at home, but useless. Please help me!

An alternative method would be to just make the substitution u=x+1 (and hence x=u-1) into this equation and find g(u), then rename u to x and your done...You wouldn't even need to expand the polynomial, you could just leave it as a polynomial in powers of (x-1)
 


Thanks for the replys.
gabbagabbahey, do you think like [itex](u-1)^3+3(u-1)+1=g(u)[/itex] ?

I got the same result [itex]u^3-3u^2+6u-3=g(u)[/itex], so if I write [itex]g(x)=u^3-3u^2+6u-3[/itex]. Thanks again.
 


Yes, [itex](u-1)^3+3(u-1)+1=g(u)[/itex] so automatically, [itex]g(x)=(x-1)^3+3(x-1)+1[/itex] and you could leave the answer just like that. (or you could expand it in powers of x and get [itex]g(x)=x^3-3x^2+6x-3[/itex])
 


gabbagabbahey said:
An alternative method would be to just make the substitution u=x+1 (and hence x=u-1) into this equation and find g(u), then rename u to x and your done...You wouldn't even need to expand the polynomial, you could just leave it as a polynomial in powers of (x-1)

That's even more direct. Good observation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K