MHB What is the General Form of the Language Recognized by the Given Automaton?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form General
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the general form of the language recognized by a specified automaton with states A (initial), B, C, and D (final). The transition function is provided, and examples of recognized words include 0, 11, and 010*. The user attempts to derive the language using a Generalized Nondeterministic Finite Automaton (GNFA) approach, sequentially removing states and simplifying the expression. The user seeks validation on whether the final expression derived after removing all states accurately represents the language recognized by the automaton. The thread emphasizes the importance of following the correct procedure to ensure the derived language is correct.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to write the language of the automaton with the following transition function in regular form with $A$ as an initial state and $B,D$ as final states.

$$\delta:\begin{matrix}
& & 0 & 1\\
& A & B & C\\
& B & C & D\\
& C & D & B\\
& D & D & C
\end{matrix}$$

I have drawn the following dfa:

View attachment 5848

Some of the words that the automaton recognizes are the following:

$$0,11,10,000,01,010^{\star},0000^{\star}, 111, 101110$$

How can we find the general form of the words of the language? (Thinking)
 

Attachments

  • sta.png
    sta.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 117
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the procedure from the proof of Lemma 1.60 (p. 69) in Sipser's book.
 

Attachments

  • dgan.png
    dgan.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 97
  • nga4.png
    nga4.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 95
  • nga2.png
    nga2.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 103
  • nga2.png
    nga2.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 103
  • nga3.png
    nga3.png
    5 KB · Views: 100
  • nga5.png
    nga5.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K