What is the impact of the refutation of "quantum foam"?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sshai45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent findings reported in the article from Phys.org indicate that "quantum foam" has been discredited, which has no significant impact on covariant Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) models, as they do not predict energy-dependent speed of light. The paper challenges Wheeler's "space-time foam" concept, establishing a benchmark constraint for quantum gravity (QG) models that involve spacetime quantization. Notably, the disproof primarily affects exotic theories previously deemed unlikely, while established QG approaches remain unaffected. Sabine Hossenfelder's analysis provides further insights into the implications of this research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime quantization
  • Knowledge of Wheeler's contributions to quantum gravity theories
  • Awareness of current quantum gravity research methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Wheeler's "space-time foam" in quantum gravity theories
  • Investigate Sabine Hossenfelder's blog for expert commentary on quantum gravity
  • Review the paper's abstract on Nature.com for detailed findings on quantum foam
  • Study existing quantum gravity models that do not predict energy-dependent speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students of theoretical physics seeking to understand the implications of recent findings on quantum foam and its relevance to established theories.

sshai45
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Hi.

I just saw this:

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-einstein-scientists-spacetime-foam.html

They are saying that they have found data showing that the "quantum foam" does not exist. What is the impact of the disproof of "quantum foam", anyways, on the search for a theory of quantum gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No impact on covariant LQG (spin foam models) because the theory does not predict energy-dependent speed of light.

I don't know of an approach to QG which is currently being worked on which does predict energy-dependent speed of light.

I can't say what the article means by "quantum foam" but the scientists quoted were testing for energy-dependent speed of light, so "quantum foam"must be some theory they have in mind which has that feature.
Or maybe it is just a way they and the journalist thought up to interest the public.
 
Last edited:
sbrothy said:
Sabine Hossenfelder discuss this paper at her blog I think. Or something similar at least.: http://backreaction.blogspot.dk/
...and a very nice and thorough, if perhaps unusually clement analysis of hers that is. Thanks for the link.
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
No impact on covariant LQG (spin foam models) because the theory does not predict energy-dependent speed of light.

I don't know of an approach to QG which is currently being worked on which does predict energy-dependent speed of light.

I can't say what the article means by "quantum foam" but the scientists quoted were testing for energy-dependent speed of light, so "quantum foam"must be some theory they have in mind which has that feature.
Or maybe it is just a way they and the journalist thought up to interest the public.

The abstract for the paper is here:
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys3270.html

They claim it challenges something called "Wheeler's 'space-time foam' picture of quantum gravity (QG)" and that "Our results set a benchmark constraint to be reckoned with by any QG model that features spacetime quantization.".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes Sabine H. assigns the blame here more to the loose (to say the least) wording of these claims in the paper than to poor reporting by the journalists.

In short, none of the main proposed theories of QG is in the least impacted, the paper rules out a few somewhat exotic ones that were already considered unlikely.
 
Last edited:
sshai45 said:
The abstract for the paper is here:
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys3270.html

They claim it challenges something called "Wheeler's 'space-time foam' picture of quantum gravity (QG)" and that "Our results set a benchmark constraint to be reckoned with by any QG model that features spacetime quantization.".
Their reference for that "picture" is to some pages in a 1964 book:

Wheeler, J. in Relativity, Groups and Topology (eds DeWitt, C. M. & DeWitt, B. S.) 467–500(Gordon and Breach, 1964).

As I said, I don't know any QG approach that is currently being worked on that fills the bill.

Brody and Wabbit have mentioned Bee Hossenfelder's blog commentary on this paper. You might find it informative. She is a recognized expert on QG testing and phenomenology---and has organized several international conferences on potential tests of QG theories/pictures/effects.

Wheeler (Feynman's PhD advisor) was a wonderfully creative man. Unfortunately he is not around these days to take up these authors' "challenge" to his 1964 foam notion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Undergrad Is the Continuum Limit of Spin Foam Dynamics Equivalent to Massless Gravitons?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Undergrad Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Graduate Landmark paper by Smolin pulls together recent QG research
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Graduate Quantum foam -RIP, or needs new formulation?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Graduate What is the Connection between Quantum Foam and Wormholes?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Undergrad At which point is gravity inconsistent with quantum mechanics?
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
Undergrad Ads/CFT and Ashtekar variables or spinfoam
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Graduate Quantum foam and discreteness of spactime for an idiot
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Symmetry/Conservation Violated in Quantum Anomaly
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K