What Is the Induced Metric on a Spacelike Hypersurface t=const?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the induced metric on a spacelike hypersurface defined by constant coordinate time, specifically t=const. The induced metric is expressed as γij = gij - (gti gtj / gtt). Participants clarify the embedding of the hypersurface using coordinates yi and spacetime coordinates xμ, emphasizing the correct differentiation process. A practical example involving the induced metric on a 2-sphere in ℝ3 is provided to illustrate the concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static metrics in general relativity
  • Familiarity with hypersurfaces and their embeddings
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus and differentiation
  • Experience with induced metrics in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the induced metric in various coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of static metrics in general relativity
  • Explore examples of induced metrics on different manifolds
  • Investigate the role of embeddings in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying general relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion.

Xander314
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let g_{\mu\nu} be a static metric, \partial_t g_{\mu\nu}=0 where t is coordinate time. Show that the metric induced on a spacelike hypersurface t=\textrm{const} is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{ij} - \frac{g_{ti} g_{tj}}{g_{tt}} .<br />

Homework Equations


Let y^i be the coordinates on the hypersurface and x^\mu the spacetime coordinates. The induced metric on a generic hypersurface defined by the embedding x^\mu = X^\mu(y^i) is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{\mu\nu} \partial_i X^\mu \partial_j X^\nu .<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't see how this can work. Since it is a hypersurface of constant coordinate time, the embedding is given by X^\mu = (t_0, X^i) so that \partial_i X^\mu = (0,\partial_i X^j). Then it immediately follows that
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{kl} \partial_i X^k \partial_j X^l .<br />
There are no g_{ti} cross terms in my answer, nor is it clear to me that \partial_i X^k=\delta_i{}^k. What am I doing wrong?
 
Xander314 said:
What am I doing wrong?

The definition of the induced metric is ##\gamma_{ab} = g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial x^{\mu}}{\partial Y^a}\frac{\partial x^{\nu}}{\partial Y^b}## where ##x^{\mu}## are coordinates on space-time and ##Y^a## are coordinates on the hypersurface.
The embedding is ##Y^a = Y^a(x^{\mu})##. So you are doing the differentiation incorrectly.

Here is a very simple example to get you started. Let's compute the induced metric on a 2-sphere in ##\mathbb{R}^3##. The coordinates on the 2-sphere are ##(\theta,\phi)## and the embedding map is ##x = R\sin\theta\cos\phi, y = R\sin\theta\sin\phi, z = R\cos\theta##. Hence \gamma_{\theta\theta} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta} = R^2 \cos^2\theta \cos^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta \sin^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta = R^2 and \gamma_{\phi\phi} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi} = R^2 \sin^2\theta \sin^2 \phi + R^2 \sin^2\theta\cos^2 \phi = R^2 \sin^2 \theta A similar calculation shows that ##\gamma_{\theta\phi} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: micromass

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K