What is the Integral of -e^(-x)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CinderBlockFist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the function -e^(-x), exploring various methods of integration, particularly focusing on u-substitution and the application of integration rules. Participants express confusion over the negative sign in the integral and the general approach to integrating exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the integral of e^(-x) results in -e^(-x), seeking a step-by-step explanation.
  • Another participant suggests that differentiating -e^(-x) yields e^(-x), which supports the integral result.
  • Some participants propose using u-substitution with u = -x as a straightforward method to solve the integral.
  • There is a discussion on the theorem stating that the integral of e^u du equals e^u times the derivative of u, with some participants expressing confusion over its application.
  • One participant mentions that for e^(-x), one must divide by -1 due to the coefficient of -x, and this method extends to other similar integrals.
  • Another participant challenges the generality of a proposed integration rule, stating it only holds when f'(x) is constant.
  • Some participants emphasize that understanding integration as the reverse of differentiation simplifies the process.
  • There is a correction regarding the conditions under which certain integration results apply, particularly emphasizing linear functions.
  • A later reply discusses the integral of 2x.e^(x^2) and questions whether the integral of f'(x)e^f(x) is always e^f(x), regardless of the nature of f'(x).
  • Participants express that one cannot derive integrals without prior knowledge of their results, highlighting the challenge of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the methods of integration and the conditions under which certain rules apply. Some participants agree on the utility of u-substitution, while others argue against its necessity in this specific case. The discussion remains unresolved on the general applicability of certain integration techniques.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of integration rules, particularly concerning the necessity of linearity in functions for certain results to hold. There is also mention of confusion regarding the application of substitution methods and the conditions under which they are valid.

  • #31
Reading through this thread I can't help thinking to myself, "How many Mathematicians does it take to change a light bulb?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

High School Straightforward integration…
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
High School Integration by Parts, an introduction I get confused with
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
High School Integration by parts of inverse sine, a solved exercise, some doubts...
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Multiplying divergent integrals using Hardy fields approach
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Solving the Difficult Integral ##\int_0^{\infty} x^{n+1} e^{-x} \sin(ax) dx##
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Undergrad Gaussian integral by differentiating under the integral sign
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
High School Calculating shaded area: I'm getting discrepancies between methods
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad Why does the integral of sine of x^2 from - infinity to + infinity diverge?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Should the function f to be continuous for applying MVTI or not?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Undergrad Ambiguity of the term "indefinite integral"
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K