What is the largest size and weight an animal can be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iDimension
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animal Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical limits of animal size, emphasizing the square-cube law's impact on land and sea animals. The largest known land animal, Argentinosaurus huinculensis, reached lengths of 30 to 50 meters and weights of 80 to 100 tonnes, suggesting this may be near the upper limit for terrestrial species. In contrast, aquatic animals like blue whales benefit from buoyancy, potentially allowing for larger sizes. The conversation also touches on the existence of larger organisms, such as a fungal mat in Minnesota, which challenges conventional size limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the square-cube law
  • Familiarity with the biology of terrestrial and aquatic animals
  • Knowledge of paleontology, specifically regarding the Argentinosaurus huinculensis
  • Awareness of ecological concepts related to organism size and habitat
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the square-cube law and its implications on animal physiology
  • Explore the evolutionary adaptations of large marine animals
  • Investigate the biology and ecology of the largest known organisms, including fungal networks
  • Examine the limits of animal size in relation to environmental factors and habitat
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for biologists, paleontologists, ecologists, and anyone interested in the physical limitations of animal size and the evolutionary factors influencing it.

iDimension
Messages
108
Reaction score
4
Due to the square cube law there is a limit to how large an animal can be. I believe sea animals are capable of being much larger than land animals because the water supports their weight but what is the theoretical limit to how large a land animal can be and a sea animal? Excluding food consumption etc just purely mathematical limits.

From looking at wikipedia it seems the largest land animal ever was the titanosaur Argentinosaurus huinculensis which stood at between 30 and 50 metres and weighed between 80 and 100 tonnes. Is this pretty much the limit for a land animal?

Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
That article doesn't answer my question and neither did any of my other searches which I why I posted on here. I'm looking for an answer that works out what the upper limit might be for a land based animal and a sea based animal.
 
iDimension said:
That article doesn't answer my question and neither did any of my other searches which I why I posted on here. I'm looking for an answer that works out what the upper limit might be for a land based animal and a sea based animal.
Maybe that's because there is no answer.
 
Are you limiting your request to animals?

There are things alive on the Earth larger than Blue Whales.

I doubt there is any meaningful hard upper limit to their size, I mean, aside from the area of the Earth's landmasses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Perforce, we're limited to land quadrupeds. Had evolution turned a different way, more legs could allow more body mass...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K