What is the Locus of Roots in a Cubic Equation with Complex Numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jammed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Complex number
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of roots in a cubic equation with complex coefficients, specifically examining the equation z^3 + az + 10 = 0, where one root is given as 1 + 2i. Participants explore the implications of this root on the value of the constant a, the representation of the roots on an Argand Diagram, and the locus of the roots as defined by the equation |6z - 1| = 13.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the transformation from z to 6z affects the locus represented by |6z - 1| = 13, suggesting that it might change the center and radius of the locus.
  • Another participant asserts that |6z - 1| = 13 can be rewritten as |z - 1/6| = 13/6, indicating a center at (1/6, 0) and a radius of 13/6.
  • A different participant challenges this interpretation, stating that their teacher insisted the locus should still be centered at (1, 0) with a radius of 13.
  • Further discussion reveals a participant's frustration with the confidence of teachers in presenting mathematical concepts, reflecting on their own experiences with learning complex numbers.
  • Another participant concludes that the roots must satisfy the original equation, leading them to believe the locus should indeed be centered at (1, 0) with a radius of 13.
  • Participants confirm that the roots calculated satisfy the equation |6z - 1| = 13, while also noting that |z - 1/6| = 13/6 is an algebraically valid transformation.
  • One participant corrects a previous statement about the real root, clarifying that it is -2, not 2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the locus of the roots, with some supporting the interpretation that the center and radius change due to the transformation, while others maintain that the original parameters should apply. The discussion remains unresolved as multiple competing views are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific algebraic manipulations and the implications of these on the locus, but there is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the locus in relation to the transformation from z to 6z.

jammed
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey i have a question:

Q. One root of the cubic equation is z^3 + az + 10 = 0 is 1 + 2i.
(i). Find the value of the real constant a.
(ii). Show all the roots of the equation on an Argand Diagram.
(iii). Show that all three roots satisfy the equation |6z - 1| = 13, and show the locus represented by this equation on your diagram.

I did (i) and (ii) second part easily. The only problem I am facing is that of locus. I mean if the last part was like |z - 1| = 13, I know that the locus is a circle of radius 13 with center (1,0) but here it is different. I mean does 6z affect the locus. If it does then what should be the locus and if it doesnot what is the reason behind it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
|6z-1|=13 is the same as |z-1/6|= 13/6, so you have a center at (1/6,0) and a radius of 13/6.
 
Are you sure about this? I did it this way but my teacher marked it as wrong saying it should still be at center (1,0) and radius 13.
 
And I bet your teacher never gave you a reason why it should still be that way.

Ask him/her where the error is in making the following steps:

[tex]|6z-1|=13[/tex]

[tex]|6(z-1/6)|=13[/tex]

[tex]|6||z-1/6|=13[/tex]

[tex]6|z-1/6|=13[/tex]

[tex]|z-1/6|=13/6[/tex]
 
By the way, for it to be centre (1,0) and radius 13 it has to simply be |z-1|=13
Why would we just ignore the change from z to 6z?
 
Your point is absolutely valid if it had to be center (1,0) and radius 13 then why change z to 6z. I will ask him and you are right he never told us why it was that way. Thanks for your help. It is really appreciated!
 
It's just that I was able to empathize for your position in this. Two years ago when I was in school we were short on books in our complex numbers class so I didn't have one. So instead I would get help solely from the teacher. Naturally, anything she told me I took as completely right since I haven't ever doubted a teacher in maths before. Maths only has the right way and the wrong way, and when your teacher is sure of herself, what's there to doubt, right?

So she told me when I was studying locus that when graphing arguments, such as [itex]arg(z)=\pi/4[/itex] All I have to do is draw the line y=x and I'm done. She never told me about the restrictions or she never knew, probably the latter... So then when our teacher was replaced when we started on another topic and had a test on complex numbers again, obviously I get it wrong. It wasn't the few marks I lost that got to me, it's that teachers tend to just think they're right about everything so whenever they teach you something, they say it with utmost confidence as if there is no doubt about it.

And then when our second teacher didn't even know how to teach these two topics in our class, I came to Physics Forums for help :biggrin: At least he was willing to admit it rather than teaching us everything the wrong way.
 
hey listen i got it. I think it was wrong because the question says that show that the roots satisfy the equation so you need to show that it satisfies the equation. Although the equation |z - 1/6| = 13/6 also satisfies it but the question specifically asks us to do so with the equation it has given n when v check the roots v see that it satisfies so the locus should be of radius 13 at center (1,0)
Btw its roots are 1 + 2i,1 - 2i and 2. The value of a is 1
 
For z=1+2i, 6z-1=6(1+2i)-1=5+12i

[itex]|6z-1|=\sqrt{5^2+12^2}=13[/itex] so it's right.

[itex]|z-1/6|=13/6[/itex] also satisfies because they are the same, we have manipulated them using correct algebraic techniques. Cutting off the 6 in front of the z is not a correct algebraic technique...

|z-1|=13 does not satisfy the roots, thus the roots do not lie on a circle centre 1 radius 13.
 
  • #10
By the way, the real root is -2, not 2.
 
  • #11
yeah you r right the root is -2 i missed it while typing. n thanks now i got a perfect reason to debate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K