kweierstrass
- 4
- 0
What is meant when writing a "one-ket" like this |1> ?
The discussion revolves around the meaning and interpretation of a "ket" in quantum mechanics, specifically the notation |1>. Participants explore its significance in various contexts, including its relation to quantum states and basis vectors.
Participants express differing interpretations of the ket notation, with no consensus on a single definition or application. Multiple competing views remain regarding the meaning of |1> in different contexts.
Participants highlight limitations in the clarity of definitions and the dependence on the specific quantum system being discussed. There is also mention of the ambiguity in the notation when the actual basis vectors are not defined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra-ket_notation#Most_common_use:_Quantum_mechanics"
In quantum mechanics, the state of a physical system is identified with a ray in a complex separable Hilbert space, \mathcal{H}, or, equivalently, by a point in the projective Hilbert space of the system. Each vector in the ray is called a "ket" and written as |\psi\rangle, which would be read as "ket psi". (The \psi\! can be replaced by any symbols, letters, numbers, or even words—whatever serves as a convenient label for the ket.) The ket can be viewed as a column vector and (given a basis for the Hilbert space) written out in components,
|\psi\rangle = [ c_0 \; c_1 \; c_2 \; \dots ] ^T,
when the considered Hilbert space is finite-dimensional. In infinite-dimensional spaces there are infinitely many components and the ket may be written in complex function notation, by prepending it with a bra (see below). For example,
\langle x|\psi\rangle = \psi(x)\ = c e^{- ikx}.