What is the meaning of a ket in quantum mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kweierstrass
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning and interpretation of a "ket" in quantum mechanics, specifically the notation |1>. Participants explore its significance in various contexts, including its relation to quantum states and basis vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that |1> typically indicates the principal quantum number is 1.
  • Others argue that for specific systems, such as the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, |1> represents the first excited state above the ground state |0>.
  • A participant notes that in their context, |1> corresponds to the eigenket associated with the eigenvalue 1.
  • Another viewpoint expresses that |1> can be seen as an abstract reference to the n=1 basis vector, emphasizing the need for implicit definitions of basis vectors.
  • One participant raises concerns about the clarity of the notation, stating that the actual eigenfunctions related to |n> are often not explicitly defined.
  • A later reply provides a link to a resource explaining that kets represent states in a Hilbert space and can be expressed in various forms, including as column vectors or in complex function notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the ket notation, with no consensus on a single definition or application. Multiple competing views remain regarding the meaning of |1> in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the clarity of definitions and the dependence on the specific quantum system being discussed. There is also mention of the ambiguity in the notation when the actual basis vectors are not defined.

kweierstrass
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is meant when writing a "one-ket" like this |1> ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That usually means the principle quantum number is 1.
 
It depends on the system; for the one-dim. harmonic oscillator it means the first excited state |1> above the ground state |0>.
 
Maybe I should have meantioned the whole context, I now realize that it means the eigenket coresponding to the eigenvalue 1 in my specific problem. Thanks anyway
 
My understanding is that it is often an abstract way of referring to the n=1 basis vector. This is similar to what someone wrote above.

The basis vectors must be implicitly defined, and then |n> refers to the nth basis vector. Unfortunately I am not clear on exactly where and how the |n> basis vectors are typically defined. I often see the notation |1> without it being clear what the ACTUAL eigenfunctions being referred to are. In that type of situation, I guess it is simply an abstraction; and index referring to a real function.
 
I think this explains it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra-ket_notation#Most_common_use:_Quantum_mechanics"

In quantum mechanics, the state of a physical system is identified with a ray in a complex separable Hilbert space, \mathcal{H}, or, equivalently, by a point in the projective Hilbert space of the system. Each vector in the ray is called a "ket" and written as |\psi\rangle, which would be read as "ket psi". (The \psi\! can be replaced by any symbols, letters, numbers, or even words—whatever serves as a convenient label for the ket.) The ket can be viewed as a column vector and (given a basis for the Hilbert space) written out in components,

|\psi\rangle = [ c_0 \; c_1 \; c_2 \; \dots ] ^T,

when the considered Hilbert space is finite-dimensional. In infinite-dimensional spaces there are infinitely many components and the ket may be written in complex function notation, by prepending it with a bra (see below). For example,

\langle x|\psi\rangle = \psi(x)\ = c e^{- ikx}.



(:rolleyes: ... is it because English is not my native language ... but "infinite-dimensional spaces" and "prepending bra" makes me think of something "completely different" ... :smile:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K