What is the meaning of K in |an|\leq K (n \in \mathbb{N})?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning of the constant K in the inequality |an| ≤ K, where n is a natural number. Participants explore the implications of K being defined as the maximum of the absolute values of the minimum and maximum points of a function or sequence, and how this relates to bounding sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that K = max{|m|, |M|} represents the maximum absolute value of the minimum and maximum values that a function reaches over a certain interval.
  • Others argue that the absolute values are necessary because the function could take on negative values, thus requiring consideration of both positive and negative bounds.
  • A participant questions whether |m| and |M| are points, seeking clarification on their role in the context of bounding functions.
  • One participant provides an example involving the sequence a_n = (2n + 1)/n, discussing how to determine bounds for this sequence and suggesting that it is bounded by 3.
  • Another example is presented with a_n = (-1)^n/n, where participants discuss how to prove that |a_n| is bounded by 1.
  • Further examples are provided, including a_n = (-1)^n + 1/n, with participants analyzing the bounds and correcting each other on the calculations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of K as the maximum absolute value of the minimum and maximum points, but there is no consensus on the specific examples provided, as participants present differing calculations and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the application of absolute values and the conditions under which the sequences are considered bounded. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the examples discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in understanding the concepts of bounded sequences and the application of absolute values in mathematical inequalities.

Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0
To prove that some function is limited we use |an|[itex]\leq K (n \in \mathbb{N})[/itex] where K = max { |m| , |M| }

What this last part mean K = max { |m| , |M| } ?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well, i think that |m| and |M| are the absolute minimum and max, that the function reaches in a certian interval. So if it is limited we choose the max of these two, so we can assure ourselves that our function will fall between these two.

It is obvious that m<M but since we are talking about abs values, then it is possible that

|m|>|M| that's why we choose the max of their abs values, since this way we are saying that

-max(|M|,|m|)< a_n<max(|m|,|M|)
 
but why abs? is { |m|, |M| } some kind of point?
 
i don't know what you exactly mean when you say is { |m|, |M| } some kind of point?

We say that a function f is bounded on an interval, call it I, if there exists a K>0 such that

|f(x)|<K for every x in I. This means that f(x) will lay between -K and K that is -K<f(x)<K for all x's in I. Now, asuume that f is continusous in a closed interval [a,b], so it means that in this interval the function reaches it's max and min values. That is there are two points c, d, on the interva. (a,b) such that f(c)=m, and f(d)=M. What this is telling us is that

[tex]m\leq f(x)\leq M[/tex] for all x in [a,b]. This tells us that the function is bounded. Now let K=max{|m|,|M|} we take abs in here since our function might as well be negative, so

[tex]|f(x)|\leq K=>-K\leq f(x)\leq K[/tex] But K is either |m| or |M| whichever of these is greater in abs value.

Say for example that both m and M are positive, then what this is telling us is that for all x's in [a,b] -M<f(x)<M, but if say both m and M are negative then |m|>|M| so this is telling us that


-|m|<f(x)<|m| for all x
s in [a,b]
 
so K = max{ |m|, |M| } , means the maximum value of this two in abs ?

I think I understand you know. And what about this string:

[tex]a_n=\frac{2n+1}{n}[/tex]

[tex]|a_n| \leq K[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{2n+1}{n}|=|2+\frac{1}{n}| > 2[/tex]

What should I do with this one (this is example, not homework question)

Thank you.
 
Physicsissuef said:
so K = max{ |m|, |M| } , means the maximum value of this two in abs ?

I think I understand you know. And what about this string:

[tex]a_n=\frac{2n+1}{n}[/tex]

[tex]|a_n| \leq K[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{2n+1}{n}|=|2+\frac{1}{n}| > 2[/tex]

What should I do with this one (this is example, not homework question)

Thank you.
well, now


[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{2n+1}{n}|=|2+\frac{1}{n}|\leq 3[/tex]


because when n=1 then a_n=3, and for any n greater than 1 we will get sth that is smaller than 3, so it means that a_n is bounded by 3 for any n.

P.S. these are sequences, not functions. Well, in a sense they are, but still.
 
So [tex]-3 \leq a_n \leq 3[/tex], like this?
 
And, what about:

[tex]a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{n}[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}|[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}| \leq K[/tex]

How will I prove for this one?
 
well,

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}|=\frac{|(-1)^n|}{|n|}=\frac{1}{|n|}\leq 1[/tex]

[tex]|(-1)^n|=1[/tex] because if we take n even, then it is obviously poz. but also if we take n odd, then (-1)^n=-1 but the abs value of -1 is still 1, so that makes it valid.

NOte , we can do this only when the sequence a_n converges, other wise we would not be able to do this all the time.
 
  • #10
And what about this:

[tex]a_n=\frac{(-1)^n+1}{n}[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n+1}{n}|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}+\frac{1}{n}|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}|+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{1}{|n|}+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{2}{|n|} \leq 1[/tex]

Like this?
 
  • #11
Physicsissuef said:
And what about this:

[tex]a_n=\frac{(-1)^n+1}{n}[/tex]

[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n+1}{n}|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}+\frac{1}{n}|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}|+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{1}{|n|}+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{2}{|n|} \leq 1[/tex]

Like this?
Well u did a couple of mistakes in there, compare it to this


[tex]|a_n|=|\frac{(-1)^n+1}{n}|=|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}+\frac{1}{n}|\leq|\frac{(-1)^n}{n}|+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{1}{|n|}+|\frac{1}{n}|=\frac{2}{|n|} \leq 2[/tex]
 
  • #12
Ok, thank you very much. In this case [tex]\frac{1}{|n|}=|\frac{1}{n}|[/tex], right?
 
  • #13
Physicsissuef said:
Ok, thank you very much. In this case [tex]\frac{1}{|n|}=|\frac{1}{n}|[/tex], right?
Yup, these are some of the properties of the abs value, and they can be proved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K