What Is the Normal Derivative in a Sphere?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of the normal derivative in the context of a sphere, particularly how it is defined mathematically and its implications in spherical coordinates. Participants explore the relationships between the normal derivative, the gradient of a function, and the geometry of the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines the normal derivative as \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} = \nabla u \cdot \hat{n}\), where \(\hat{n}\) is the unit outward normal of the sphere's surface.
  • Another participant clarifies that \(\hat{n}\) is a unit vector perpendicular to the sphere and that the "r" in \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\) is a variable, not a vector.
  • A participant references a PDE book to express that \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} = \hat{n} \cdot \nabla u\) can be expressed in terms of Cartesian coordinates, leading to confusion about how to equate this with \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\).
  • There is an exploration of the gradient in spherical coordinates, where participants discuss how \(\nabla u\) can be expressed and its relationship to the unit normal vector \(\hat{n}\).
  • Participants express uncertainty about the presence of a negative sign in the relationship between the normal derivative and the radial derivative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the normal derivative and its mathematical representation. There are multiple competing views regarding the definitions and relationships involved, particularly concerning the negative sign and the transition between different coordinate systems.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the definitions of the variables and the implications of the negative sign in the equations presented. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the coordinate system used.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Normal derivative is defined as:

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} = \nabla u \;\cdot\; \hat{n}[/tex]

Where [itex]\hat{n}[/itex] is the unit outward normal of the surface of the sphere and for a small sphere with surface [itex]\Gamma[/itex], the book gave:

[tex]\int_{\Gamma} \frac{\partial u}{\partial n} \;dS \;=\; -\int_{\Gamma} \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} \;dS[/tex]

The book claimed on a sphere:

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} = \nabla u \;\cdot\; \hat{n} \;=\; -\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]

Where [itex]r[/itex] is the radius of the sphere. I understand [itex]\hat{n}[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] but [itex]r[/itex] is not unit length.

Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no vector [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] in that formula. The [itex]\hat{n}[/itex], in [itex]\nabla u\cdot \hat{n}[/itex] is the unit vector perpendicular to the sphere and so parallel to the "r" direction. The "r" in
[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]
is the variable r, not a vector.
 
HallsofIvy said:
There is no vector [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] in that formula. The [itex]\hat{n}[/itex], in [itex]\nabla u\cdot \hat{n}[/itex] is the unit vector perpendicular to the sphere and so parallel to the "r" direction. The "r" in
[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]
is the variable r, not a vector.

Thanks for the reply.

I understand r is only a variable, I am trying to say [itex]\hat{n}[/itex] is the same as vector irradia from the center of the sphere.

You have any pointers regarding my original question?
 
I found the explanation from the PDE book of Strauss.

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} \;=\;\hat{n} \;\cdot\; \nabla u \;=\; \frac{x}{r} \frac{du}{dx} \;+\; \frac{y}{r} \frac{du}{dy} \;+\; \frac{z}{r} \frac{du}{dz} \;=\; \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]

Where [itex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}[/itex]

I don’t get how to go from

[tex]\frac{x}{r} \frac{du}{dx} \;+\; \frac{y}{r} \frac{du}{dy} \;+\; \frac{z}{r} \frac{du}{dz} \;=\; \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]



Let me try this way and please comment whether this make sense.

In Spherical coordiantes:

[tex]\nabla u \;=\; \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\hat{r} \;+\; \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\hat{\theta} \;+\; \frac{1}{r^2 sin \theta}\;\frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi} \hat{\phi}[/tex]

We know [itex]\hat{r} \hbox { is parallel the the outward unit normal } \hat{n}[/itex] and therefore [itex]\hat{n} \cdot \hat{\theta} = \hat{n} \cdot \hat{\phi}=0[/itex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \; \nabla u \cdot \hat{n} \;=\; [\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\hat{r} \;+\; \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\hat{\theta} \;+\; \frac{1}{r^2 sin \theta}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi} \hat{\phi}] \;\cdot\; \hat{r} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}[/tex]

Where I substute n with r. But I still don't get the "-" sign yet.

Please give me your opinion.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K