What is the Origin of the Mole Abbreviation in Chemistry?

  • Context: Chemistry 
  • Thread starter Thread starter woosh9013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The abbreviation for mole in chemistry is universally recognized as "mol," while some individuals recall a notation involving an "m" with a line over it, which is not widely accepted or documented. This discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the use of different abbreviations, particularly in educational settings. The notation "g/mol" is correctly associated with molar mass, not the mole itself. The consensus among participants is that the "m" with a line is an uncommon or possibly erroneous representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic chemistry terminology, including "mole" and "molar mass."
  • Familiarity with chemical notation and units of measurement.
  • Knowledge of common abbreviations used in chemistry.
  • Awareness of historical variations in scientific notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the standard abbreviations used in chemistry, focusing on "mol" and "g/mol."
  • Explore the historical context of chemical notation and its evolution.
  • Investigate common misconceptions in chemistry education regarding units and symbols.
  • Learn about the significance of proper notation in scientific communication.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the conventions of chemical notation and the importance of standardized abbreviations in scientific discourse.

woosh9013
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In high school, I remember one of my chemistry teachers abbreviating mole by drawing a line over an m. I haven't seen anyone else do that. I've seen mol. many many times in books and from most other teachers/professors. Is the m with the line some older method for symbolizing mole? Does anyone know where she came up with that method of abbreviation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never seen that, and I was young many moons ago.
 
The abbreviation, if you want to call it that, for mole is . . . 'mol'.

About as helpful as the abbreviation for dyne. ('dyn')

Whee! one less letter. :D

Are you sure your teacher wasn't talking about molar mass? That would be something like g/mol -- you know, as in the molar mass of water is about 18.0 g/mol.
 
And even then, for molar mass, \tilde{m} is the symbol for the variable, not the unit itself. (That's supposed to be a bold m with a tilde over it, but I'm apparently having a bad Tex day.)
 
I've seen mol abbreviated at m before, but never m with a bar over it. You could be integrating something possibly?
 
There was no integrating going on. It was extremely basic high school chemistry, and none of us knew any calculus at the time.

I'm positive she wasn't talking about molar mass. She used the abbreviation throughout the entire year, probably hundreds of times. She even told us that we could use the m with the line or mol., but not the m alone since that generally signifies meters.

I thought somebody would have seen that notation before. That's really weird. I guess I should stop using it.
 
Then there is the unfortunate possibility that your teacher was the one with the wires crossed. It happens. Even Einstein accidentally wrote E = MC hammer before he got it right.

Well, no, but you get the point.
 
Joskoplas said:
Even Einstein accidentally wrote E = MC hammer before he got it right.

Oh so thats how he does it! And I thought it took a genius

No I have never seen this abbreviation either. I'm sure you won't cramp your hand writing down an extra stroke for mol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
36K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
34K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K