I'm just learning linear algebra, where we are taking a set of basis vectors and then using gram schmidt to convert them to an orthonormal basis.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So I know I can do it. I know orthonormal is great. But as I'm modifying the basis anyway from the original, why don't I just forget the original basis and just use (0,0,1) (1,0,0) (0,1,0) and be done with it.

Is some useful information being preserved from the original basis into the orthonormal basis? I'm looking for some motivation for this process.

Thanks,

Sean

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is the point in calculating orthonormal bases for R3

Loading...

Similar Threads - point calculating orthonormal | Date |
---|---|

I Points of a finite projective line | Sep 14, 2016 |

I Categories of Pointed Sets - Aluffi, Example 3.8 | May 3, 2016 |

Transform that maps points from any quad to an reactangle | Sep 22, 2015 |

Calculating the position of the 'other' focus point of an orbit | Dec 19, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**