What is the primary evidence that the Earth's outer cores is fluuid in nature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueyellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evidence Nature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The primary evidence that the Earth's outer core is fluid in nature is derived from the behavior of seismic waves, particularly the absence of S-waves and the characteristics of P-waves. S-waves, which cannot travel through liquids, are not detected on the opposite side of the Earth from an earthquake, indicating the outer core's liquid state. Additionally, the movement of molten iron within the outer core generates the Earth's magnetic field, further supporting the conclusion of a fluid outer core. Recent models suggest that the core may contain lighter elements like silicon, challenging previous assumptions about its composition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic wave types, specifically P-waves and S-waves.
  • Basic knowledge of Earth's magnetic field generation.
  • Familiarity with continental drift and its geological implications.
  • Introductory concepts in geophysics and astrophysics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and behaviors of P-waves and S-waves in seismology.
  • Explore the relationship between the Earth's magnetic field and molten iron dynamics.
  • Investigate the role of lighter elements in the Earth's core composition.
  • Study the implications of seismic wave discontinuities on Earth's internal structure.
USEFUL FOR

Geophysicists, seismologists, students in Earth sciences, and anyone interested in understanding the Earth's internal structure and dynamics.

blueyellow

Homework Statement



What is the primary evidence that the Earth's outer core is fluid in nature? (2 marks)

The Attempt at a Solution



The Earth has a magnetic field which is created by molten iron that is moving. If there were a solid outer core, there would be no moving iron and no magnetic field.

Continental drift - all continents are still drifting and creating volcanoes - this includes the edges under the deep oceans.

Is this what one needs to say for two marks, do you think? So is the primary evidence just the Earth's magnetic field? Or can the speed that waves travel at through the outer core also be taken as primary evidence? But what is THE primary evidence? I tried to look this up, but there doesn't seem to be a simple straightfoward answer. Please help. Please do not say that this does not belong in Advanced Physics. This is a question from a third year course and I find it complicated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up the difference between p and s waves in seismology.
 
I have learned (currently taking an introductory Astrophysics class) that it is shown by measuring the discontinuity of seismic waves. An earthquake on one side of the Earth can be detected at various points on the other side of the Earth but on directly the opposite earthquake (as well as in a certain distance radially outward from that point), those detections are disrupted. P-type waves, which travel much slower through a liquid, are virtually the same as sound waves. From this we can deduce that there is something at least slowing the wave down in the core. That does not imply it is a liquid, however. S-waves, which deal with a shear force interaction (side to side like when you pull a card out of a deck of cards and others come out with it), are not present in the area on the opposite side of the Earth as I described, a property limited to liquids. By taking various measurements, one can basically isolate what the core looks like.

I also recently read an article saying that models aimed at replicating these effects have proven that our core is not as fully iron as we think. Based on the results of these models, there are theories that silicon or other lighter elements exist in non-negligible quantities inside the Earth's core.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K