MHB What is the principle when borrowing $3100 at 15% per three years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
The principle when borrowing $3100 at 15% over three years is simply the amount borrowed, which is $3100. The formula I = prt is referenced, but it is clarified that the principle refers to the initial loan amount, not the total repayment amount including interest. The discussion emphasizes that the term "principle" is often misunderstood. Ultimately, the principle remains $3100, as stated clearly in the question. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate financial discussions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
When Dave borrowed $3100 at 15% per three years, the principle was?

Do I use I = prt?

If so, the set up is 3100 = p(0.15)(3), right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The principle is simply the amount borrowed, not the amount that will have to be paid back after interest is added. So, in this case the principle is \$3100.00. :)
 
MarkFL said:
The principle is simply the amount borrowed, not the amount that will have to be paid back after interest is added. So, in this case the principle is \$3100.00. :)

Strange question. The answer is given within the words.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top