MHB What Is the Probability of Guessing Correctly on a Multiple Choice Test?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of guessing correctly on a multiple-choice test and understanding the differences between binomial and hypergeometric distributions. The probability of getting exactly 6 out of 10 questions correct, when guessing, is calculated using the formula $$\binom{10}{6} (0.2)^6 (0.8)^4$$. A related question about selecting all-stars from a group leads to confusion about whether to multiply by the combination formula twice, which is clarified by noting that order does not matter in these cases. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and applications of probability distributions. Overall, the participants aim to clarify the correct approach to solving these probability problems.
Amad27
Messages
409
Reaction score
1
A test consists of 10 multiple choice questions with five choices for each question. As an experiment, you GUESS on each and every answer without even reading the questions.
What is the probability of getting exactly 6 questions correct on this test?

The answer is: $$\binom{10}{6} (0.2)^6 (0.8)^4$$

I see that, there $\binom{10}{6}$ ways of selecting $6$ correct questions here.

But then, take a question like:At a soccer match there are 230 all-stars and 220 half-stars. You pick five people from the crowd. What is the probability that exactly two are all-stars?

I would say:

$$P = \frac{\binom{230}{2} \cdot \binom{220}{3}}{\binom{450}{5}}$$

My question is, arent there also many ways to choose the $2$ all stars out of the $230$? So wouldn't you multiply by $\binom{230}{2}$ again?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Olok said:
My question is, arent there also many ways to choose the $2$ all stars out of the $230$? So wouldn't you multiply by $\binom{230}{2}$ again?

Hi Olok,

I'm not sure I understand your question.
$\binom{230}{2}$ is the number of ways to choose the $2$ all stars out of the $230$, which is a pretty large number.
What is the reason you think we should multiply by it twice?

Btw, your second formula represents the hypergeometric distribution instead of the binomial distribution. (Nerd)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Olok,

I'm not sure I understand your question.
$\binom{230}{2}$ is the number of ways to choose the $2$ all stars out of the $230$, which is a pretty large number.
What is the reason you think we should multiply by it twice?

Btw, your second formula represents the hypergeometric distribution instead of the binomial distribution. (Nerd)
No, because in the first one, we multiply by $\binom{n}{k}$ because the order matters, doesn't the order also matter in the second one?

I think I am messing this all up.

Are you using these definitions to solve probability like this? Like the definition of hypergeometric distribution, binomial distribution? Is it by definition that we use that?
 
Olok said:
No, because in the first one, we multiply by $\binom{n}{k}$ because the order matters, doesn't the order also matter in the second one?

I think I am messing this all up.

Whether order matters or not can be a bit confusing.
Actually, in both of these cases, we say that order does not matter.

For instance in the first case, it doesn't matter which of the questions are right, only how many of them.
Now suppose we want to know the probability that exactly the first 6 questions are right and the last 4 questions are wrong.
Then the order does matter and the probability is $0.2^6 \cdot 0.8^4$.
But since the order does not matter, the probability goes up by $\binom{10}{6}$, since that is the number of different configurations to have 6 questions right.
Are you using these definitions to solve probability like this? Like the definition of hypergeometric distribution, binomial distribution? Is it by definition that we use that?

The relevant definition, if we want to call it that, is that
$$P(\text{Desirable outcome}) = \frac{\text{Number of desirable outcomes}}{\text{Total number of outcomes}}$$
(Fine print: that is under the assumption that all outcomes are equally likely.)

The formulas are derived from that. Once you have them, it's easiest to use them rather than derive them again.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top