What Is the Probability of Measuring Spin-up for Electron in State Alpha?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_doors
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability of measuring the spin of an electron in a specific state when the spin operator \( S_y \) is applied. The original poster presents a scenario involving the spin state represented as \( \alpha = (a, b) \) and seeks clarification on the probability of obtaining a measurement result of \( \hbar/2 \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the probability using the inner product of the eigenvector and the state vector. Some participants question the correctness of the provided solution, suggesting there may be a misunderstanding regarding the measurement process and the associated calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants asserting the original poster's approach is correct while others express doubt about the validity of the provided solution. There is a focus on clarifying the distinction between measurement and operator application in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misconceptions about quantum measurement and the mathematical representation of probabilities in this context. The original solution appears to conflate measurement with operator application, which is under scrutiny.

the_doors
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
hello guys

Suppose an electron is in the spin state alpha=(a,b). if s_y is measured, what is the probability of result h/2 ?


s_y eigenvector for +h/2 is |y+>=1/sqrt(2) (1,i)) so the probability is (<y+|alpha>)^2 . but in the solution i attached , the solution is different ! I'm confused !



thank you for your help
 

Attachments

  • sl.jpg
    sl.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 1,114
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't bother, your solution is correct.
 
so the solution is incorrect ?
 
well there's certainly something wrong when you measure a probability in terms of [itex]\hbar[/itex]2...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
the_doors said:
so the solution is incorrect ?
Yes, the solution is incorrect. Whoever wrote it made the common mistake of conflating making a measurement with applying the associated operator. In other words, the "solution" calculates ##\langle +_y \lvert \hat{S}_y \rvert \alpha,\beta\rangle## for the probability amplitude while you correctly calculated ##\langle +_y \vert \alpha,\beta\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K