What Is the Pushforward of the Inversion Mapping at the Identity of a Lie Group?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the pushforward of the inversion mapping at the identity of a Lie group, denoted as $G$. The inversion mapping is defined as $i(g) = g^{-1}$. The problem remains unanswered in the forum, indicating a need for further exploration and solutions regarding the pushforward in the context of Lie groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of pushforward mappings in the context of smooth manifolds
  • Basic grasp of group theory and inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of pushforward mappings in differential geometry
  • Study the structure and examples of Lie groups
  • Explore the concept of tangent spaces and their relation to Lie groups
  • Investigate the implications of inversion mappings in algebraic topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry, algebraic topology, and the study of Lie groups, will benefit from this discussion.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $G$ be a Lie group, and let $i : G \to G$, $i(g) = g^{-1}$, be the inversion mapping. Compute the pushforward of $i$ at the identity of $G$.
-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
Let $e$ be the identity of $G$; let $m : G \times G \to G$ be the multiplication mapping given by $m(g,h) = gh$ for all $g,h\in G$. Let $X\in T_eG$. By linearity of the pushforward $m_{*,(e,e)}$,

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,i_{*,e}(X)) = m_{*,(e,e)}(X,0) + m_{*,(e,e)}(0,i_{*,e}(X)).$$

If $c(t)$ is an integral curve of $X$ starting at $e$, then $i(c(t))$ is an integral curve of $i_{*,e}(X)$ starting at $e$. Thus $(c(t),e)$ and $(e,i(c(t))$ are integral curves of $(X,0)$ and $(0,i_{*,e}(X))$, respectively, starting at $(e,e)$. Hence

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,0) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(c(t),e) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} c(t) = X$$

and

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(0,i_{*,e}(X)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(e,i(c(t)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} i(c(t)) = i_{*,e}(X).$$

This establishes the equation

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X, i_{*,e}(X)) = X + i_{*,e}(X).$$

On the other hand, since $(c(t),i(c(t))$ is an integral curve of $(X,i_{*,e}(X))$ starting at $(e,e)$,

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,i_{*,e}(X)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(c(t),i(c(t)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} e = 0.$$

Therefore

$$0 = X + i_{*,e}(X),$$

yielding $i_{*,e}(X) = -X$. This proves that $i_{*,e}$ is given by the negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K