MHB What Is the Pushforward of the Inversion Mapping at the Identity of a Lie Group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the pushforward of the inversion mapping at the identity of a Lie group, denoted as $G$. The inversion mapping is defined as $i(g) = g^{-1}$. Participants are encouraged to engage with the problem, but no responses have been provided yet. A solution is available for reference. The thread highlights the mathematical exploration of Lie group properties and their mappings.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $G$ be a Lie group, and let $i : G \to G$, $i(g) = g^{-1}$, be the inversion mapping. Compute the pushforward of $i$ at the identity of $G$.
-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
Let $e$ be the identity of $G$; let $m : G \times G \to G$ be the multiplication mapping given by $m(g,h) = gh$ for all $g,h\in G$. Let $X\in T_eG$. By linearity of the pushforward $m_{*,(e,e)}$,

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,i_{*,e}(X)) = m_{*,(e,e)}(X,0) + m_{*,(e,e)}(0,i_{*,e}(X)).$$

If $c(t)$ is an integral curve of $X$ starting at $e$, then $i(c(t))$ is an integral curve of $i_{*,e}(X)$ starting at $e$. Thus $(c(t),e)$ and $(e,i(c(t))$ are integral curves of $(X,0)$ and $(0,i_{*,e}(X))$, respectively, starting at $(e,e)$. Hence

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,0) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(c(t),e) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} c(t) = X$$

and

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(0,i_{*,e}(X)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(e,i(c(t)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} i(c(t)) = i_{*,e}(X).$$

This establishes the equation

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X, i_{*,e}(X)) = X + i_{*,e}(X).$$

On the other hand, since $(c(t),i(c(t))$ is an integral curve of $(X,i_{*,e}(X))$ starting at $(e,e)$,

$$m_{*,(e,e)}(X,i_{*,e}(X)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} m(c(t),i(c(t)) = \frac{d}{dt}\bigg|_{t = 0} e = 0.$$

Therefore

$$0 = X + i_{*,e}(X),$$

yielding $i_{*,e}(X) = -X$. This proves that $i_{*,e}$ is given by the negative.