MHB What Is the Ratio of Area to Perimeter for a Rug with Length 9w?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of the area to the perimeter of a rug where the length is eight times greater than the width, defined as (w + 5). The area is determined to be A = 8(w + 5)², while the perimeter is calculated as P = 18(w + 5). The ratio R of area to perimeter is expressed as R = A:P = 8(w + 5)² / 18(w + 5). A clarification is made regarding the interpretation of "8 times greater than the width," suggesting it should be understood as 9w instead. The thread emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the dimensions to solve the problem accurately.
Kathleen217744
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The length of a rug is eight times greater then the width. if the width of the rug is (w+5), what is the ratio of the area of the rug to the perimeter of the rug in simplest form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: help

Hi, welcome to the forum!

Let's write out what we know.

$width = w + 5$

The length is also given, but it's been disguised a little bit.

The length of a rug is eight times greater then the width

This just translates to, $length = 8 \cdot width = 8 \cdot (w + 5)$.

Now we have everything we need from the question, let's look at the next part.

what is the ratio of the area of the rug to the perimeter of the rug in simplest form?

Let's focus first on finding the area of the rug, and the perimeter of the rug.

area of rug $= A = length \cdot width = 8(w + 5)(w + 5) = 8(w + 5)^2$.

perimeter of rug $= P = 2 \cdot length + 2 \cdot width = 2w + 10 + 16w + 80 = 18w + 90 = 18(w + 5)$.

Finally, the question asks for the ratio of the area to the perimeter. Let's call the ratio R.

Then, $R = A:P = \dfrac{A}{P} = \dfrac{8(w + 5)^2}{18(w + 5)^1}$

Can you finish it off? :)
 
"8 times the width" would be 8w but I would interpret "8 times greater than the width" as "the width plus 8 times the width"- w+ 8w= 9w.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top