MHB What Is the Ratio of Area to Perimeter for a Rug with Length 9w?

Kathleen217744
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The length of a rug is eight times greater then the width. if the width of the rug is (w+5), what is the ratio of the area of the rug to the perimeter of the rug in simplest form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: help

Hi, welcome to the forum!

Let's write out what we know.

$width = w + 5$

The length is also given, but it's been disguised a little bit.

The length of a rug is eight times greater then the width

This just translates to, $length = 8 \cdot width = 8 \cdot (w + 5)$.

Now we have everything we need from the question, let's look at the next part.

what is the ratio of the area of the rug to the perimeter of the rug in simplest form?

Let's focus first on finding the area of the rug, and the perimeter of the rug.

area of rug $= A = length \cdot width = 8(w + 5)(w + 5) = 8(w + 5)^2$.

perimeter of rug $= P = 2 \cdot length + 2 \cdot width = 2w + 10 + 16w + 80 = 18w + 90 = 18(w + 5)$.

Finally, the question asks for the ratio of the area to the perimeter. Let's call the ratio R.

Then, $R = A:P = \dfrac{A}{P} = \dfrac{8(w + 5)^2}{18(w + 5)^1}$

Can you finish it off? :)
 
"8 times the width" would be 8w but I would interpret "8 times greater than the width" as "the width plus 8 times the width"- w+ 8w= 9w.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top