What Is the Rocket Equation From a Non-Mathematician's Viewpoint?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed interpretation of the rocket equation from a non-mathematical perspective, incorporating concepts of parallel universes and dimensionality. Participants explore the implications of this interpretation on existing scientific theories and the nature of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a new equation for energy that includes the cube root of mass multiplied by five times the speed of light, suggesting it as an alternative to established theories.
  • The same participant introduces the idea of incorporating three additional dimensions or parallel universes to define the existing universe, arguing that these perspectives are necessary for a complete understanding.
  • Another participant criticizes the initial proposal as nonsensical and lacking mathematical rigor, suggesting it does not contribute meaningfully to scientific discourse.
  • Further elaboration by the original poster includes concepts of an Ideal Past and Ideal Future, asserting that these dimensions are interconnected and essential for understanding the Present universe.
  • Critics continue to dismiss the contributions as unscientific and lacking substance, with some participants expressing frustration over the perceived lack of seriousness in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is significant disagreement among participants, with some defending the creative interpretation of the rocket equation and others vehemently rejecting it as nonsensical. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the validity of the proposed ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of expertise and perspectives, leading to a contentious atmosphere. The discussion highlights the challenges of integrating artistic or non-mathematical viewpoints into scientific discussions.

artrocket
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm curious how the science folks here would see this 'rocket equation' I formulated:

Energy (E) = the cube root of mass (m) multiplied by 5 times the speed of light (C).

I'm not a mathematician, I'm more into art. It was borne out from my visualization of the universe (an ideal future) as I perceived it. They kept looking for the fictitious graviton but they won't and never will, find it. I'm proposing this equation instead. :-p

I will try to share what this is about, in a language I can express, with the science folks here as the thread progresses.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
artrocket said:
I'm not a mathematician,

That is quite evident. Stop posting gibberish and nonsense.
Post reported.
 
There's still more. I perceive that to define our existing universe (E=mc^2), there is the need to incorporate 3 more dimensional, parallel universes. But these must be perceived from the viewpoint within the Singularity, where past present and future gets blurred. The Omega Point Theory only identified one facet of the universe, I am identifying 4 that interlinks one with another, and to perceive these other three parts are necessary to define one part (our Present existing physical universe).

The rocket equation is borne as the third dimensional perspective, to be known as our Ideal Future that we are about to enter.

The second is our Present universe, the first is our Ideal Past universe, wherein it incorporated our classics, myths, legends, glories that we put into our memory. The Ideal Past is like a pattern that is parallel with the Ideal Future; both are centripetal, implosive in nature. Being a pattern, the boundary of Ideal Past is E=square root of mass times twice lightspeed, which constitutes the rest mass of the Present E=mc^2. Of course, these patterns, as the Ideal Past is necessary to create our Present, are necessary to create the latter, which is expansive, centrifugal in nature.

The rocket equation is summed up as the cube root rest mass boundaries of 3 dimensions (Ideal Past, Present, Ideal Future) + twice the speed of light, incorporatting the pattern boundaries even of Ideal Future, because it is centripetal and implosive in nature too.

The rocket equation will be the pattern for the 4th dimensional perspective, the Future-Present, which is like a mirror to our Present, and it is centrifugal, expansive in nature. The equation for Future-Present will be E=mc^3, wherein the rocket equation is included with rest mass pattern boundaries of Ideal Future and Ideal Past, plus the relativistic speed of light, thus assigning the value c^3.

The Future-Present, similarly as the Present, being centrifugal, expansive dimensions, are like catalysts for the expansion of our Universe.
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
That is quite evident. Stop posting gibberish and nonsense.
Post reported.

Your abrupt criticism is an absolute nonsense. What made you think only mathematicians monopolize TRUTH?? your mode of perspective is obsolete and gibberish.
 
Last edited:
Mere masturbation fantasies of the ignoramus do not count as science.

Nor, I would add, should it count as art.
 
arildno said:
Mere masturbation fantasies of the ignoramus do not count as science.

Nor, I would add, should it count as art.

That is your highly subjective perspective deprived of any imaginative capacity, which is far from scientific, but borne out from the arrogance of your ignorance to the profoundness far greater than your technical paradigms.
 
Last edited:
Random speculation and flaming... this thread is done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K