What is the scariest scientific concept?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various scientific concepts that evoke fear or discomfort among participants. Topics include the nature of time, mortality, the implications of evolution, and existential thoughts related to the universe and human existence. The scope encompasses philosophical reflections, personal experiences, and theoretical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express discomfort with the idea of time having no end or a definitive beginning.
  • There are mentions of the fear surrounding human evolution and the implications of being descendants of apes.
  • Concerns are raised about the expanding knowledge leading to an awareness of more unknowns, particularly regarding fundamental constants of nature.
  • Infinity, zero, and nothingness are highlighted as concepts that provoke fear.
  • Several participants share personal experiences related to the fear of death and the idea of ceasing to exist.
  • The atomic bomb is noted as a particularly frightening scientific concept by one participant.
  • Some participants reflect on their childhood fears of death and how those fears have evolved over time.
  • AI and its potential consequences are mentioned as a source of anxiety.
  • Discussions also touch on the philosophical implications of mortality and the fear of dying versus being dead.
  • The concept of heat death of the universe is introduced as a source of concern.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of personal fears and reflections, with no consensus on which scientific concept is the scariest. Multiple competing views on mortality and the implications of scientific knowledge remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants' reflections are influenced by personal experiences and philosophical considerations, leading to a variety of interpretations of fear related to scientific concepts. The discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding these fears.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the intersection of science and philosophy, particularly those contemplating existential questions and the implications of scientific advancements on human life.

  • #61
Ivan Seeking said:
GRBs. I don't like threats for which there is no possible defense.

Spaghettification - what a way to go!

Global Climate Change - perhaps the greatest challenge ever faced by civilization.



Those would be the sorts of things that motivated me to get a physics degree. "Scary" is not the word that comes to mind. :biggrin:

Looks like it's just me that has issues with the size of space or duration of 'time'...

As a side note, are you going to have a 'Happy 10,000 Posts' party?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
It always seems weird to me when I hear people say things like "cosmology freaks me out" or "I don't like to think about those things". To me, the scarier thing would be if humans only had the capacity to think about proximate trivial things. It would be such a loss.

A note on the dying thing, while a priori non-existence seems like the most likely outcome, it doesn't seem that likely to me from a philosophical perspective. Think of the anthropic principle. We can't perceive non-existence. If there is any outcome to the universe besides a single universe that "ends" (without the possibility for the creation of a new universe) then it would seem eventually "we" would reform at some point. And the single ending universe scenario seems unlikely, since the universe did form from "nothing."


Also, I find the concept of torque scary.
 
  • #63
if the ozone layer will be broke and the Earth will be hit by the sun, and we all be burn from that heat coming from the sun...
this really scares me.. so now, we still have time to preserve and save our mother earth.. let's all be aware of this..!

[spam link deleted]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #64
Reverse Universe.

Among the physical laws it is a general characteristic that there is reversibility in time; that is, should the whole universe trace back the various positions that bodies in it have passed through in a given interval of time, but in the reverse order to that in which these positions actually occurred, then the universe, in this imaginary case, would still obey the same laws.

Imagine it; complete craziness. The universe would begin to shrink, resulting in the reversal of time; the reversal of ENTROPY. This is incredible, but quite hard to swallow.

Don't worry though, this will probably happen in more than a trillion years.
 
  • #65
Vincit said:
Imagine it; complete craziness. The universe would begin to shrink, resulting in the reversal of time; the reversal of ENTROPY. This is incredible, but quite hard to swallow.

Fiat lux ?
 
  • #66
Nothing
 
  • #67
The fact that everything I ever know or could ever know will amount not not more than 1 part in trillions and trillions in both the time and space dimensions. That so much of this vast universe is censored from us.
 
  • #68
Loren Booda said:
Actually, the "atoms" were my retinal rods firing from photons in the near-dark, the one that chased me during my early years might be described as a very threatening "black hole" (or was derived from a stay in a cabin with scary knotholes) and the eventual change of its image into insect scat (while dreaming, now under control in my hand, yuck, but just that of an insect) made it more ridiculous than dangerous.

Reminds me of when I was 3-5 years old and noticed "faces" in wood paneling. It always felt like someone was watching me in those rooms.

sganesh88 said:
Isn't the holocaust a direct evidence of such a dark nature of humans.? Not just the holocaust, there were several million wars before the WWII and in each of them not just the soldiers but almost equal number of innocent civilians were also murdered and raped. All these rapes and murders were committed by the apparently normal human beings who were ploughing the fields or making jewels before a particular war started.

What's scary? The idea that maybe we're all hardwired with this type of behavior as a solution to the "too many people, not enough resources" problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
7K